Tesla's 'Free' Model X for Referrals Probably Eligible for Federal Tax Credit

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 31st, 2020 Published: September 3rd, 2015

tesla s free model x for referrals probably eligible for federal tax credit

Details on Tesla’s “free” Model X for the first 10 referral buyers have been few since the beginning. First it appeared that the program would be limited by time, then it appeared it would be limited by country, now it appears that it’ll be limited by continent.

The first person to refer ten friends in each sales region— North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific — will receive a free Founder Series Model X.

But even more unclear is exactly how Tesla will give its winner their new Model X. Depending on how that happens, there are very few scenarios in which the new Model X owner (with 10 friends wealthy enough to buy new Model S cars) wouldn’t qualify for up to $7,500 back from the feds.

A spokesperson from Tesla didn’t comment on whether the Model X referral winner would qualify for the federal tax credit. A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Energy, the government agency that administratively handles the incentive, said he was unaware of a situation similar to Tesla’s Model X incentive and said the vehicle would qualify for the tax credit if the referrer used it as a personal vehicle, and qualified under the law as the original “acquirer” — the IRS doesn’t designate that the person must “purchase” the EV.

The applicable tax code only states that for the car to qualify for the credit ( IRC 30D):

the original use of which commences with the taxpayer,
which is acquired for use or lease by the taxpayer and not for resale,
which is made by a manufacturer,
which is treated as a motor vehicle for purposes of title II of the Clean Air Act [42 USCS §§ 7521 et seq.],
which has a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 14,000 pounds, and
which is propelled to a significant extent by an electric motor which draws electricity from a battery which–
- has a capacity of not less than 4 kilowatt hours, and,
- is capable of being recharged from an external source of electricity.

According to several accountants and CPAs, the $130,000+ cars would still be subject to significant income tax, under which there are extremely few scenarios that the qualifying referrer could escape (legally, anyway) paying tens of thousands for their finder’s fee prize.

But for the lucky one in North America who found 10 people to buy a Model S and get a Model X in return, Uncle Sam may have something for you for return for helping out the EV car business.

(Thanks TTAC legal readers!)

#FederalEvTaxCredit #ModelS #ModelX #ReferralProgram #TaxCredit #Tesla

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 5 comments

Shaker on Sep 04, 2015

I would think that the "winner's" vehicle's MSRP would be taxed under "Capital Gains" rules, which would net much more for the Federal Gov't (even with the $7.5k rebate), than a vehicle purchased with after-tax earnings, which would lose the $7.5k. The owner may also owe State Tax, too, depending on the state. I'm sure that the B&B will clarify this as the day moves on... :-)

Like Reply
SCE to AUX on Sep 04, 2015

The Federal EV rebate program doesn't depend upon the price paid for the vehicle, which is why the i-MiEV, Leaf, and 500e get the same amount as a Model S. So you might ask this - why do lowly EVs get the same rebate as expensive Teslas? Right now, I can get a new 2015 Leaf for $22k BEFORE the $9500 in rebates I'm eligible for, and before any negotiation. If I manage to beat the dealer down to $20k or $10k, what is that to you or anyone else? What if I got it for free after trading in a different car? This ongoing run of editorializing news is unabashed class envy against 'rich' Tesla owners, and by extension, against Tesla itself. Tesla and its buyers didn't invent this policy - liberals did. Now you rail against it because it doesn't benefit the 'right' people in your own eyes. But as another poster astutely pointed out recently, the rebates are not intended to reward people, but to 'save the environment' by keeping one less ICE off the roads. Whether it's a Tesla or a Leaf shouldn't matter - both are highly efficient vehicles that purportedly achieve the stated goals of the rebate programs, as did hybrids before them. So who buys them, and the price paid, is irrelevant.

Like Reply
- EChid on Sep 08, 2015
  
  Well said.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)