Piston Slap: Reporting on The Oil Report

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Greg writes:

Sajeev, first let me thank you for your interesting article on Mazda rust last year. Ultimately I bought the Accord, which to me seemed to have the superior (and quite lovely) stick shift, even though the Mazda is reputed superior in that department.

I decided for kicks and giggles to get my oil tested by Blackstone, and I thought this might be a potential article for Piston Slap (not my adventure, but the practice of having it done).

It wasn’t as complete a report as one might hope, because my mechanic forgot to draw the sample and dumped the oil in the barrel. All I could forward to Blackstone was a few drops from the oil filter. But they were able to test that small sample, except for the flashpoint and viscosity.

Here’s the report in PDF form.

Of interest:

  1. The metals are about 10x the average level of metals (chrome, copper, aluminum, molybdenum, etc.) in most cars. Blackstone said this is the breaking in process, but this is the first time I’ve seen real data on the “wearing in” or “breaking in” of a car.
  2. The TBN (total base number) was 2.1, over the 1.0 minimum suggested by Blackstone, after 8,200 miles. Apparently engine oils are made to lean to the base side and as they get used the base number declines and in the extreme case will become acidic. I did some research on this and the TBN of the OEM Honda oil was apparently about 8.1 when new (just sleuthing around to see what Honda used) and the TBN of the Mobil 1 synethetic 0-20W is about 8.8. If you get the long-lasting or extended use formula (whatever they call it) it has a TBN of about 12 when new but you’re going up to something like 5-30, which is not the recommended oil for this Accord.

For $40 I think it was a useful thing to do. It put my mind to rest about my practice of changing my oil 2x a year, and it seems like something one should do in the first year or two of ownership and again in the car’s elder years when it can diagnose various kinds of engine degradation. Apparently oil testing is a competitive industry, but the usual customer is a fleet owner who is looking at a significant operating cost in oil changes.

Sajeev concludes:

I am glad these oil report services exist as they do make folks feel more comfortable and help ensure a healthy motor. As we’ve learned from many vehicles ( here and here, for starters) over the last 15+ years, doing whatever the owner’s manual recommends isn’t necessarily the right move.

Blackstone’s recommendation to extend your oil change intervals to 9,000 miles makes sense, considering their analysis and the fact that this Honda isn’t known to be a sludge bucket.

Off to you, Best and Brightest!

[Image: Shutterstock user Africa Studio]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.


Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • Gn842 Gn842 on Jul 30, 2015

    I didn't realize my note to Sajeev would constitute the substance of the article or I would have written it a bit differently. One of the reasons why I wanted to get the oil tested was that the Honda uses 0-20 weight and I was concerned that something like 5-30 or 10-30 might be a better choice. As it happens 0-20 stands up to the use I put on the car. I'm not interested in changing the oil at 9k as 2x per year (roughly 6 to 8k on average) is my usual routine, and what I wanted to do was validate my usual routine with the lighter oil. An additional reason for getting the oil tested was that I was in correspondence with a Honda Accord owner in Canada who has been having problems with gasoline getting into his oil in cold weather, and I was worried that I would have the same issue. His dipstick levels actually rise as a result of this problem. I don't know if his problem is unique or widespread but so far I haven't seen it. He has had the engine replaced. Oils designed for durability have a higher TBN than the 0-20 synthetic but it seems that the 0-20 is just fine. I'm not looking to extend the oil changes to one year and beyond because I agree that it is wise to keep tabs on the oil levels and changing the oil twice a year is affordable to me. It's also affordable to me to get the oil tested I've blown forty bucks on things that were a good deal less interesting to me.

  • VolandoBajo VolandoBajo on Jul 30, 2015

    And one more data point, one for a Panther, in honor of Sajeev, who helped to hone my Panther love. I believe my assertion about oil weight in the modular motor OHC V8's is correct. I will not give detailed references, but will name my sources. The 4.6L V8 originally came with a recommendation to use 5W-30 oil. Later FoMoCo changed that to 5W-20. But cutting to the chase, this was done mostly to placate our CAFE masters, gaining miniscule mpg savings. A certain knowledgeable member of the B&B may have knowledge of a different version of this story, but I believe I have seen some fairly convincing docs showing that, with a moderately large dollar-denominated gun pointed to its corporate head, Ford elected to roll over from the 30 to the 20 number. And I believe it is probably "good enough" to use the 5W-20, but the 5W-30 provides a bit more protection. I haven't ever seen a source that says that the new spec is good for the engine in any way other than fractional mpg. A former Ford engineer who later worked for NASCAR as an engineer stated that fact, and posted some links to support it. And he said that while most motors do not get used hard enough to create a problem, for him, the 5W-30 was a bit better from the standpoint of engine protection, and that he personally would continue to run it in his 4.6L V8. And I am doing the same...I change the oil on my Panther every 6K miles, based on the fact that there are some short hops, but I try to time the engine to at least get the motor and the oil well warmed up to prevent sludge, and the oil still looks and feels clean at 6K. While I intend to use one of the more or less all-inclusive FoMoCo services one of these times, which with discounts are around $30, my wife prefers that we save about ten bucks, and go for the $20 chain corner shop changes. Never Jiffy Lube after a dim bulb poured oil into the clutch inspection hole on the bell housing of a Rabbit, but Tires Plus (a Firestone sub), Mr. Tire, that sort of thing. And I watch them like a hawk, and mark the filter to make sure it got changed. Use a Kendall syn blend, 5 qts. With my driving patterns that works out to about two changes a year, perhaps a bit more if we take a distant vacation. My other local chain store uses Valvoline. Indications are from what I have seen on BITOG and elsewhere that both are at least solid choices. YMMV, but this seems like a good decent drill for the Panther. At least it still purrs for me when I rev it and when a put a bit of shoe to it every now and then. Runs a bit quicker too with a Superchips 87 octane tune. Would like the hotter tune, but hate to work a 200K engine too hard. Just wanted a little more acceleration and some firmer shifts, which I got. But it is a good car, and I feel I am treating it well with that interval and that grade and brand of oil. Not that I couldn't just spend another $50 a year plus or minus to change it every 3K, but I just don't see evidence that it does any measurable good.

    • JimC2 JimC2 on Jul 30, 2015

      A lot of Toyota engines started out approved for 5w30 but allowed (or maybe recommended, cleared, whatever) 5w20 by a technical service bulletin a few years ago.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next