Rental Review: Cadillac ATS 2.0T AWD

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

11 years ago, Cadillac told us that they were “The Standard of the World”, in a blast of Zeppelin-backed TV spots and aggressively geometric styling. The 2003 CTS wasn’t even the standard for North American luxury cars, but hey, it took Audi another 30 years to even come close to making that claim. Cadillac seems to be moving at a much quicker pace.

Despite Cadillac’s confidence in their excellence, they are reticent to lend any press vehicles to TTAC. The timing of a recent trip required a one day rental, and the local Avis counter advertised a special on the “Cadillac CTS” for just $80 a day with unlimited mileage. It turns out that Avis does indeed rent out the CTS, but our particularly branch did not. Instead, we were assigned a silver ATS4 (all-wheel drive) with the 2.0T engine and 6-speed automatic. Remember kids, if it seems to good to be true…

It would be incorrect to say that I was disappointed, but I had hoped for the CTS precisely because a) the relentless hype had me curious about its overall competence b) we are lacking in reviews of the car and c) every ATS I have driven thus far has been a letdown. Around the time of its launch, I briefly sampled a rear-drive 3.6L with all of the bells and whistles, and found it underwhelming. A second drive, in a 2.0T with the 6-speed manual, did nothing to dispel my skepticism. The 6-speed manual was unequivocally one of the worst gearboxes I’ve ever sampled, and the engine’s NVH characteristics were shockingly coarse for a luxury sedan. I could not, for the life of me, understand the praise being heaped upon this car.

After a solid day’s drive, I have a better picture in my head of why the ATS is so highly regarded. Part of it comes down to the fact that the team of engineers, product planners, designers and marketers have managed to great a truly worthy sports sedan. The other half of that equation is that the competition has miraculously managed to recede in overall competence to the point where the ATS is the class leader by default.

The ATS can reasonably lay claim to “The Standard of the World” title by virtue of its 2.0T engine, which is, well, the new standard of the world for virtually every mid-size car that would normally have used a V6 engine, thanks to a combination of regulations and economies of scale. The 2.0T in the ATS isn’t particularly charming or refined, but it does bring 272 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque at just 1700 rpm. Like most of these new turbo four-bangers, the torque builds down low and stays fairly robust throughout the rev range that you’d use in any realistic situation, including spirited back road driving.

Acceleration, passing on two-lane roads and any other task that relies on forward thrust is accomplished with minimal fuss, and it’s hard to see why anyone would bother with the V6 when the power on tap here is so usable in everyday situations. The 6-speed automatic transmission is the superior choice versus the manual, but it doesn’t feel terribly responsive or sophisticated. However, this gearbox will likely be replaced by either the 8L90 GM 8-speed automatic, or the Aisin 8-speed from the Cadillac CTS, so dwelling on its shortcomings is a bit of a moot point.

The most compelling part of the ATS is the chassis, which stands out as a credit to GM’s engineering team. It’s hard to think of a car that is able to so expertly balance ride and handling, delivering a smooth, composed ride no matter what the road surface, while also delivering on the “sport” part of the equation. Befitting its rental car specs, our ATS had a smaller wheel and tire combo than what I normally see on the road, and that may have contributed to the ATS being a bit more sedate. But through twisty stretches of road, the ATS still delivered in a big way, with flat cornering, eager turn-in and communicative, if not particularly weighty steering.

A spirited drive makes it plain why the ATS was met with such a chorus of approval when it debuted. GM has finally made a proper sports sedan that is better to drive than the current BMW 3-Series. Part of this has to do with the fact that current F30 has lost its way in such a severe manner that the ATS assumes this mantle by default: I have not driven the Lexus IS350, our EIC’s favorite sports sedan, and I know that an E90 328i is superior in every way, but right now, the ATS is without a doubt the best handling luxury sports sedan on the market.

Unfortunately, it has two glaring flaws.

  1. The back seat is tiny. Cadillac stole a lot of good things from the BMW playbook. One of them seems to be the size of the E36’s rear seat area. My two passengers, at 5’8″ and 6’2″, were initially enthusiastic about my rental car selection. By the end of it, they were cursing the Caddy.
  2. CUE is unequivocally the worst infotainment system on the planet. By comparison, the early renditions of MyFord Touch look like something running iOS. The haptic controls never quite worked the way they were meant to and even the slightest bump or pothole in the road can send your finger veering off to the tab or menu item that you didn’t intend to touch, leaving you to navigate through a confusing menu system that only leads to distracted driving.

More time would yield a more thorough evaluation of the ATS. For now, I can only determine that somewhere within the bowels of the RenCen, there are a talented group of engineers that are capable of making something that truly is “The Standard of the World”. Their electronics division is another matter…

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 131 comments
  • KrohmDohm KrohmDohm on Jul 24, 2014

    I have to disagree on CUE. I rented an ATS for 10 days last December. I was able to add my phone, program radio presets and everything I needed to do without cracking a manual. I never failed to quickly find a function I needed and the voice recognition was quite good. There are better systems but the Ford/Microsoft are far worse. I will agree on the touch screen sensitivity over bumps but that probably common to all of them.

  • Upstater Upstater on Apr 16, 2015

    I find this review kinda funny, having just had a 328i X Drive as a rental for a week, and drove R/T from NY to DC. I had high hopes for this vehicle but was ultimately let down; its controls were confusing (dumb joystick), had cowl shake like the rattley 5 series taxi's in Europe that are all over, iDrive is maddening, and the materials from inside to outside were economy car quality; it was tinny. Further, the 2.0 BMW engine sounds horrible, so bad that it's an abomination to put that in a car of this price. The only good part is the Z.F. transmission - it's a good box. I truly felt the vehicle was clearly the victim of cost cutting, leveraging the history of the brand over delivering quality. On CUE, I'm not one that likes too much technology, but I find CUE quite easy with functions organized intuitively. Response to touch, try the "calibrate' function, it works great. Auto critics chide Acura for too many buttons, now Cadillac for too little, but let's also remember that to change a fan speed on an Audi or to turn on seats heaters on a BMW it requires scrolling through menus. I've owned all three brands, and CUE is easier than those. But it appears that all the hate is once again directed to an American manufacturer. I've owned all European cars (5 Audi's, 4 VW's, 2 BMW's, 1 Volvo, 1 SAAB), and have an ATS. The quality is there, this is more than "competitive" with those brands and I'm not afraid of keeping it past warranty. The ATS is a great vehicle, yes the sport suspension can be rough on SOME surfaces, but for the most part the magnetic ride control is amazing. As is the power and efficiency of the engine, and the overall quality of materials, which are very nice and better than some but not all of the euro-brands. It's also not a vinyl palace like the "leatherette" interiors from Europe. It's also not a dime a dozen cheap lease. No it's not a big car. If you want a big car, then buy one. But the space is adequate and the seats are amazing. Let's be fair and not have higher standards for American built cars; the scrutiny this and other American cars are put under is unfair. This is a vehicle GM and our American manufacturing can be proud of and it doesn't deserve the bashing it receives here.

  • Carson D I hadn't seen a second-generation Courier with a Mazda engine before. I've seen a few with Ford engines. There was one at the Cox Driving Range that they used to collect golf balls. Golf would definitely be more entertaining to watch if they used moving targets.
  • Tassos ooops, Tim, you missed this one. Would make a lovely "Tim's used car of the day". It satisfies all the prerequisites except the wildly overpriced bit.
  • Tassos ASTON AND BOND BY A MILE. While Aston Martin sells a TINY FRACTION of what even the rarified Ferrari and Lambo sell, it is unbelievably well known. Credit the idiotic, but hugely successful and sometimes entertaining James Bond Movies.
  • Tassos 1988? Too young for me. It's all yours, Tim... BAHAHAHAHA!
  • Gray Awesome. Love these. But, if I had the money for a Fox-body, there is a clean '84 GT 350 here for little more than half the price.
Next