Cain's Segments: Affordable Off-Roaders

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The general belief that no genuine Jeep Wrangler alternative sells in anything like the kinds of numbers achieved by the Wrangler is a belief that is completely, wholeheartedly supported by the facts.

Let’s be honest. The Wrangler’s popularity, in particular the Wrangler Unlimited’s fruitful endeavor into the mainstream auto buying consciousness, couldn’t happen without one of two occurrences: either offroading is exploding in popularity as a leisure activity, or some buyers who would otherwise choose a Ford Escape (and its kind) are buying a Jeep Wrangler.

Regardless of the circumstances which are leading buyers to the Wrangler, there are more such buyers than ever before, and it’s not as though there are a wide array of Wrangler-like alternatives in the U.S. market. Pickup trucks aside, the Toyota FJ Cruiser and Nissan Xterra stand out as the other two affordable offroaders, the ones which could reasonably be modified to become ultra-capable offroaders.

Does that status matter to the majority of buyers? Not only does it matter to those who wish to travel far off the beaten path, it also matters to buyers who will never even contemplate leaving the pavement. The fact that they’ll be driving something that could do so if need be – rather than just looking like it might be able to – is a huge part of the Wrangler’s appeal; the FJ’s and Xterra’s, too.

But the FJ Cruiser is on its last legs. Meanwhile, plans to spend a vast amount of money on redesigning and relaunching the Xterra are sketchy as, after all, the Xterra sells barely more often than the Titan.

Don’t be confused by the year-over-year change. Yes, Xterra sales are rising in 2013, but an increase of 2% for such a low-volume vehicle translates to just 335 extra sales through eleven months. Moreover, the overall new vehicle market, especially the SUV/crossover market, is growing at a much faster clip than the aging Xterra. Of greater relevance is the fact that this current YOY growth comes after one of the Xterra’s worst ever years in terms of U.S. volume. 17,222 were sold in all of 2012, a 5% drop compared with 2011, and a 78% drop compared with the 79,779 Xterras which were sold in 2002.

One might also ask why the FJ needs to be cancelled if the its year-over-year decline is so slight, but that question, too, would only be asked by one who hasn’t studied the FJ’s U.S. history. Sales peaked at 56,225 in the model’s first year, fell as low as 11,941 units in 2009, and then averaged just 14,000 sales per year since 2010. It’s been allowed to languish without significant updates even as consumers who may once have been enamoured by its style became more aware of its poor visibility and excessive base price.

Granted, the compromises a buyer must accept to tolerate life with the Jeep are numerous, yet they don’t seem to be significant enough to keep away a record number of buyers. The Wrangler’s success leads us to believe that others could also succeed, that there is some untapped potential. On the other hand, the decreasing number of FJ and Xterra sales causes us to wonder if Jeep, with all the Wrangler’s history and its cheap toplessness and its steady improvement, should simply be the sole purveyor of affordable offroaders.

So unique is the Wrangler and so wide is its product range that even the Xterra and FJ Cruiser hardly seem like Wrangler rivals. They’re certainly not sales volume rivals. Being the one and only hasn’t always turned out well for automakers. Consider the Renault Avantime, Subaru Baja, and Lincoln Blackwood. In the Wrangler’s case, its climb to its current status as one of America’s 30 best-selling vehicles is proof that the Wrangler is, well, it’s not a Renault Avantime.

AutoNov. 2013Nov. 2012%Change11 mos. 201311 mos. 2012%ChangeJeep Wrangler11,75310,337+ 13.7%143,474130,124+ 10.3%Nissan Xterra14451343+ 7.6%16,17815,843+ 2.1%Toyota FJ Cruiser11501164– 1.2%11,82612,145– 2.6%—— —————Total14,348 12,844 + 11.7% 171,478 158,112 + 8.5%
Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 94 comments
  • Dave M. Dave M. on Dec 10, 2013

    I love the Wrangler but sadly find it cramped for 6'3" frame. I looked briefly at the Xterra; lack of a power seat and sunroof kind of killed it for me. The FJ is hideous, both inside and out. The Wrangler is iconic, and they keep making it better every year...

    • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on Dec 10, 2013

      I'm 6'5" and I very much wish they made a lower seat rails for JK. Some taller people make new rails from scratch or cut and re-weld stock rails. Jeep is supposed to be modded like that, but still, what a pain.

  • LUNDQIK LUNDQIK on Dec 10, 2013

    Its looks like the market for an affordable off-roader is relatively stagnant; with between 150k and 200k units being moved annually. So if you're Nissan or Toyota - do you fight for a bigger piece of a smaller pie? Or do you put your R&D money into the bigger volume cars? It’s a no brainer, Nissan and Toyota will focus on their other vehicles. But for Jeep – the Wrangler IS Jeep; it’s their go-to Halo vehicle. It’s their image and what sells the rest of the lineup.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next