GM Mobilizes Geek Squad, But Should Have Talked To Me First

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

In-car entertainment and navigation systems bamboozle customers and ruin the out-of-the-box experience.”You see a lot of people get into the vehicle, and they can’t figure out the damned system,” Mark Harland, manager of GM’s connected customer team, told Reuters. “They get frustrated, and they get online and bash it, and that ends up on J.D. Power and Associates.” GM decided to do something about it. Will it make the damned systems more intuitive? No, it throws 25 people into the fight against technological ignorance. It has been tried before …

GM thinks the problem is not the system, it’s the damned dealer that won’t explain the damned system. GM sends 25 tech-savvy specialists to its 4,400 U.S. dealerships to show how to teach customers about technology. GM’s geek squad is backed-up by a dedicated team at GM’s call center. According to the report, “GM is also requiring that its dealers have at least one staff member trained in all of GM’s in-car systems – MyLink, CUE and IntelliLink – by the end of this year.”

Years ago, when I advised a very large European carmaker in these and other matters, the company had similarly huge problems with then much simpler technology.

For instance, car radios were swapped several times under warranty because the volume was changing without anyone touching the dial. The swaps did not fix the problem. Customers became upset and satisfaction scores plummeted. After months of drama, it emerged that it wasn’t a bug, it was a feature: The volume adapted to in-car noise, actually, the volume rose and dropped with the speed of the car, but nobody had told the customer. Or the service writer.

Like GM now, the large European OEM that starts with “V” and ends in “olkswagen” sicced trainers at dealers and required them to explain the verdammte System to the verdammte Kunde. The dealers said this would take at least an hour each, they would rather use the time to sell cars, and if the car company really wants them to teach tech to the uninitiated, then only in exchange for a horrendous hourly fee. Thus ended the project.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 55 comments
  • Kitzler Kitzler on Nov 28, 2012

    I am not sure who said it before me, but actually whoever has to switch cars among a lot of different makes, all this telematics crap must drive them up the wall, literally, it is already bad enough switching from one German to another german car,but going from the German system, incidentally with the fuel tank on the right, to a Japanese system, with fuel tank on the left, must be mind numbing. Perhaps a uniform set of standards is what is truly needed.

  • Mandalorian Mandalorian on Nov 28, 2012

    From the first two minutes of my test drive on an Audi Q7, I was fluent in MMI. Same when I test drove a Yukon Denali. I think that it has more to do with the users refusal to learn, than it does the vehicle itself. But then again, I did take some College computer programming classes in High School...

    • Signal11 Signal11 on Nov 28, 2012

      Don't pat yourself on the back too much there. In a recent Audi rental I was in, it only took me a few minutes to connect my phone, change the default language and set a destination with the built in navigator. MMI is fairly intuitive. OTOH, in the previous month, I had spent a month and a half in a Mercedes-Benz E350 that had the most awful controls imaginable. Using it at a daily driver, I never quite figured out how to get everything to without spending minutes fiddling with the controls. It has everything to do with the vehicle's human interface design. I've been using computers since I was a kid, and am something between an amateur and pro in the field of computer-human interaction, meaning that if you use one of a few smaller, specific Linux distros, you might have seen some of my work. If someone like me is stumbling around in your user interface design, it is not me who has the problem, but your UI.

  • CoastieLenn No idea why, but nothing about a 4Runner excites me post-2004. To me, they're peak "try-hard", even above the Wrangler and Gladiator.
  • AZFelix A well earned anniversary.Can they also attend to the Mach-E?
  • Jalop1991 The intermediate shaft and right front driveshaft may not be fully engaged due to suspected improper assembly by the supplier. Over time, partial engagement can cause damage to the intermediate shaft splines. Damaged shaft splines may result in unintended vehicle movement while in Park if the parking brake is not engagedGee, my Chrysler van automatically engages the parking brake when we put it in Park. Do you mean to tell me that the idjits at Kia, and the idjit buyers, couldn't figure out wanting this in THEIR MOST EXPENSIVE VEHICLE????
  • Dukeisduke I've been waiting to see if they were going to do something special for the 60th Anniversary. I was four years old when the Mustang was introduced. I can remember that one of our neighbors bought a '65 coupe (they were all titled as '65 models, even the '64-1/2 cars), and it's the first one I can remember seeing. In the '90s I knew an older gentleman that owned a '64-1/2 model coupe with the 260 V8.
  • SCE to AUX "...the complete Mustang model lineup to peruse"Will the fake Mustang show up, too?
Next