Ominous Signs For Australia's Large Rear-Drive Sedans

ominous signs for australias large rear drive sedans

As dismissive as I tend to be of the internet product-planning brigade, their constant cries of “Bring rear-drive, V8 full-size Aussie sedans to America” may have some credibility – the market for these cars in Australia seems to be going teats up, with SUVs and small cars taking their place.

The Holden Commodore and Ford Falcon are clearly suffering; while they once vied for either of the top two spots, the Commodore is the 5th best selling vehicle in 2012 so far, trailing the Mazda3 by about 6,000 units, while the Falcon doesn’t even merit a spot in the top 10.

Some observers have cited SUVs as a possibly culprit for the demise of the Australian family sedan, but a look at the sales table for both 2011 and 2012 shows that smaller, fuel-efficient cars are eating the lunch of the “Aussie Rules” cars. The Mazda3 bumped the Commodore off a 15-year winning streak in 2011, and the market hasn’t looked back since.

Nameplates like Corolla, Cruze, i30 and Yaris have crept up on the big sedans, and dominated the first half of 2012, along with the venerable Toyota Hilux pickup. The Falcon and its stablemate, the Ford Territory, are nowhere to be found in the Top 10, a bad sign for Ford’s Australian operations.

Australia’s auto industry has been having subsidies pumped into it for a number of years, but things only seem to be getting worse. A journal published by leading Australian industries astutely noted that the Australian market is “…too small for manufacturing; too prosperous to ignore.” The short-term future seems to hold a continued injection of government money into the auto industry – and quite possibly, the demise of the rear-drive Australian sedan.

Join the conversation
5 of 54 comments
  • Chicagoland Chicagoland on Jul 20, 2012

    "...what customer base is left to them is the rusted on conservatives resistant to change; the rest view the vehicle as a big heavy thirsty boat, regardless of what is under the hood, and associated with ‘bogans’*;" Change some words and same could be said about the old Crown Vics. Some 'enthusiasts' for some time have been going "bring Falcon here, it will push Japanese cars back". Umm, if it can't succeed in AUS anymore, then it's fading fast. One other trend noticed is most new 'traditional' German cars have AWD optional, and I see many "X" or 'AWD' tags on new BMW's, Infinitis, and Benzes in North Shore burbs of Chicago, i.e. very rich area

    • See 2 previous
    • El scotto El scotto on Jul 20, 2012

      High end cars with "KNAUZ" license frames.

  • Car_guy2010 Car_guy2010 on Jul 20, 2012

    You know, I don't understand how 'Utes rose to popularity in Australia. That doesn't mean that I don't approve of them. In fact, the Aussies surprise me every time with a car that I wouldn't have heard of otherwise. Add in content from kiwi contributors and Bryce (certainly, you must have heard of him once at another popular site run by a Neidermeyer) and you have a hell of an entertaining site. Bring on that Aussie/Kiwi knowledge, folks! I love to read about what other people are driving halfway across the world from me. It makes me appreciate cars a lot more!

  • Kurkosdr Someone should tell the Alfa Romeo people that they are a badge owned by a French company now.The main reason PSA bought FiatChrysler is that PSA has the technology to enter the luxury market but customers don't want a French luxury car for psychological/mindshare reasons. FiatChrysler has the opposite problem: they have lots of still-respected brands but not always the technology to make good cars. Not to say that if FCA has a good platform, it won't be used in a PSA car.In other words, if those Alfa Romeo buds think that they will remain a silo with their own bespoke platforms and exclusive sheet metal, they are in for a shock. This is just the start.
  • Arthur Dailey For the Hornet less expensive interior materials/finishings, decontent just a little, build it in North America and sell it for less and everyone should be happy with both the Dodge and the Alfa.
  • Bunkie I so wanted to love this car back in the day. At the time I owned a GT6+ and I was looking for something more modern. But, as they say, this car had *issues*. The first of which was the very high price premium for the V8. It was a several thousand dollar premium over the TR-7. The second was the absolutely awful fuel economy. That put me off the car and I bought a new RX-7 which, despite the thirsty rotary, still got better mileage and didn’t require premium fuel. I guess I wasn’t the only one who had this reaction because, two years later, I test-drove a leftover that had a $2,000 price cut. I don’t remember being impressed, the RX-7 had spoiled me with how easy it was to own. The TR-8 didn’t feel quick to me and it felt heavy. The first-gen RX was more in line with the idea of a light car that punched above its weight. I parted ways with both the GT6+ and the RX7 and, to this day, I miss them both.
  • Fred Where you going to build it? Even in Texas near Cat Springs they wanted to put up a country club for sport cars. People complained, mostly rich people who had weekend hobby farms. They said the noise would scare their cows. So they ended up in Dickinson, where they were more eager for development of any kind.
  • MaintenanceCosts I like the styling of this car inside and out, but not any of the powertrains. Give it the 4xe powertrain - or, better yet, a version of that powertrain with the 6-cylinder Hurricane - and I'd be very interested.