Generation Why: General Motors Pulls Facebook Ads, Social Media Fever Entering Remission

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler
generation why general motors pulls facebook ads social media fever entering

Happy 28th birthday, Mark Zuckerberg. Your baby is about to go public, but GM still had to rain on your parade by pulling their advertising from Facebook because GM ad men didn’t think it was effective.

The Wall Street Journal explains the move

GM, started to re-evaluate its Facebook strategy earlier this year after its marketing team began to question the effectiveness of the ads. GM marketing executives, including Mr. Ewanick, met with Facebook managers to address concerns about the site’s effectiveness and left unconvinced advertising on the website made sense, according to people familiar with GM’s thinking.

GM is said to spend (or, have spent) about $40 million per year on maintaining a Facebook presence, but only a quarter of that went to advertising. The remainder goes to creating content like fan pages and other social media initiatives, which will still continue. GM’s digital marketing guru Joel Ewanick told the WSJ that he still sees value in these programs, and a statement from GM obtained by Reuters re-affirmed their commitment to this side of the marketing equation.

As much as GM gets singled out in this column, GM may be doing something right in terms of both budgeting and strategy. One report claims that 57 percent of respondents have never clicked on a Facebook ad. For young people who have grown up next to online content and advertising, this number is undoubtedly much higher. This demographic sees these kinds of ads more as background noise than anything of value – or, as marketers would say, “a way to forge an authentic connection with the brand and enter into a conversation with the consumer.”

The bigger leap of faith for GM, and a number of OEMs, is to refine how they interact with consumers via social media. What do Facebook “likes” or Twitter followers really mean in concrete terms? The field of social media has impacted many of us in positive ways, but it’s also create a disproportionate number of charlatan “social gurus” who pitch their dubious knowledge to companies that are afraid of getting left in the dust if the let their Twitter or Facebook pages lie dormant. Ford likes to cite how many millions of “impressions” the Fiesta Movement program got, but sales of the Fiesta have given Ford little reason to throw a party. In fact, GM’s apparently ineffective Facebook campaigns have helped the Cruze outsell the Focus in 2011 (though the Focus is ahead through April, 2012), while the Sonic (which only went on sale last fall) is outselling the Fiesta through April, 2012.

Tout them all you want, but “likes”, “retweets” and “impressions” (perhaps the most ill-defined of them all) are empty metrics that sound great when trying to justify one’s absurd consulting fees, but don’t translate into good products or good profits, the two things that make the automotive world go ’round. Then again, cognitive dissonance is a powerful force.

This story really has bigger implications for Facebook than GM. GM is the third biggest spender on ad dollars in the USA. Their exit may not harm Facebook in the short term, but if big institutional clients keep dropping out, then Zuckerberg’s baby may see some compromised revenue streams. I’m going to take this as a sign of positive changes for GM. Maybe they’re starting to take a closer look at the social media mania that’ stricken other OEMs and realize that it has to be done right, or you will lose them forever. And by them, I mean the people you are trying to bring in, and targeting with marketing initiatives that really need to be axed right this second.

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 54 comments
  • Crosley Crosley on May 15, 2012

    Facebook will be MySpace in 5 years, only an idiot would get near the IPO. Mark Zuckerberg is just another Mark Cuban, a guy that was in the right place at the right time. He's certainly no visionary, FaceBook was just a college version of mySpace. A 28 year old programmer in charge of $100 billion company, I'm sure it's only up from here on out. Companies are already seeing the futility of advertising on Facebook, the dwindling user base will be the next shoe to fall.

    • See 3 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on May 16, 2012

      @highdesertcat Well put! Even so, some adults have put their life's story on social media and once out there, there's no way to get rid of it. The pedophile involvement was recently brought out in my area as LE arrested a whole slew of pedophiles in a village north of me as part of an international ring. They seized tons and tons and tons of pictures of kids taken from the social sites, some of which that were photoshopped with the kids' heads cropped onto naked bodies. Sexting by teens has also become a rich source of nude-teen pictures that will haunt these kids forever, even after they have grown old and wrinkly. But that aside, social media is a great source of interaction and a rich ground for advertisements. GM should not reduce their exposure. And people should be careful what they divulge about themselves.

  • Rmwill Rmwill on May 16, 2012

    How much of GM's pulling out is related to the constant barrage of "Government Motors" and anti bailout comments on their posts on Facebook?

  • SCE to AUX "had far more to do with working with Venezuela to ensure freer elections and more international cooperation than expanding anyone’s oil supply"That's double BS - no oil purchase will clean up Venezuela's corruption, and of course the administration wants to see lower gas prices.The US chooses its friends poorly, and this is the latest example.
  • Jkross22 Aren't toy cars by definition those with 2 seats?
  • SCE to AUX Nothing new to see here. Indonesia is already the world's largest nickel producer (30%) at 800 metric tons.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_nickel_productionLiberals don't care because this production advances the EV agenda, and conservatives feign concern only because it's a convenient weapon against the EV agenda.Absolutely nobody cared when the same nickel mines helped produce every other product we have been buying for the last 50 years.
  • FreedMike So...large scale energy production has consequences, no matter what the source. Wouldn't have guessed that in a million years.
  • SPPPP I doubt that the fishermen and locals get any direct benefit from this industrial park. This would be a hardship in any country, but particularly bad in a place with a land-based (or water-based) subsistence economy. You can't just take your fishing skills and move to the city.
Next