Texas: College Station Plans Taxpayer Funded Ad Blitz to Save Red Light Cameras

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The city of College Station, Texas is planning to spend thousands of taxpayer dollars on advertising that could save the city’s red light cameras. A citizen-led initiative has put the program’s future up for a public vote on November 3, but documents obtained under freedom of information laws by College Station resident Jim Ash indicate the city intends to spend thousands to saturate local television with pro-camera commercials and run full-page advertisements in the local newspaper. These ads would run in addition to those paid for by the for-profit company that operates the cameras. “Could the City of College Station go so far with this voter eduction program they end up violating spirit or letter of the Texas Election Code, by the nature, size, timing, and aggressiveness of their planned ‘educational program?'” Ash asked. “Is this the same city that could not find even one more dime in spending cuts last week?”

Texas law allows government agencies to provide information to the public and to respond to requests for information and analysis, but it specifically states that “an officer or employee of a political subdivision may not spend or authorize the spending of public funds for political advertising.” Violating this statute is a Class A misdemeanor.

In an email to the local newspaper, the Bryan-College Station Eagle, the city’s assistant communications director, Wayne Larson, tied the advertising campaign directly to the upcoming election.

“Can you make some suggestions on what ad space we could purchase to promote our red light camera voter education efforts [in the] days leading up to fall elections,” Larson asked on August 10, 2009. “I would think a full page opposite letters to editor would be considered, and those front page footer ads… I’m open to your ideas.”

Larson’s suggestions, if approved, would give the newspaper at least $10,000 in taxpayer money. A cable television advertising proposal dated August 8, 2009 gave a pricetag of $10,004 on the desired campaign consisting of 874 pro-red light camera commercials with “approximately 1600 additional spots” thrown in “at no cost.” According to Larson, the commercials are designed to make photo ticketing an emotional issue to divert attention away from the independent studies that have shown red light cameras tend to increase the number of injury accidents where they are used ( view studies).

“Yes, in dialogue with Troy and CMO, there has been discussion on using the funding invested into safety improvements as one of the talking points in framing this up as an emotional issue v. the technical arguments,” Larson wrote on August 23. “There is a strategic meeting set with CMO in a week to confirm.”

The amount of money discussed appears to be nearly seven times the amount spent, according to budget documents, to announce the program when photo ticketing began in February 2008. The public relations blitz may also be related to Mayor Ben White’s concern that the public distrusts city council actions. White described this sentiment in an email dated August 6 upon returning from a meeting with a local business owner.

“The feelings of many citizens is that the actions of the council are always negative and not transparent,” White wrote, describing the concerns raised at the meeting. “[The feeling is that] We are not interested in the citizens knowing what is going on.”

White tried, and failed, to block the referendum in August.

A copy of the city documents Ash requested are available in a 400k PDF file at the source link below.

Pro-Red Light Camera Advertising Documents (City of College Station, Texas, 9/11/2009)

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Texlovera Texlovera on Sep 15, 2009

    I suggest that for this year's Aggie bonfire, rather than cutting down trees, a different species of noxious weed be harvested and burned. It's a win-win!

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Sep 15, 2009
    I suggest that for this year’s Aggie bonfire, rather than cutting down trees, a different species of noxious weed be harvested and burned. I always thought of politicians more as pests than weeds. :-0 What the goverment of College Station is doing sickens me. How any one of the city councilmen or the mayor should remain in office after this has been brought to light is a mystery to me. I would gladly vote for anybody else, as I have done in the past in our own local elections for far less blatently dirty acts, than for this type of "leadership." Unfortunately, the small time beaurecrats directly responsible for this campaign against the citizens they "serve" are probably untouchable due to union rules.
  • Marty The problem isn't range; it's lack of electricity in multi-unit building parking. All you need is level 1 - a standard 120v wall socket - and if you're plugged in 10 hours overnight you get 280 miles per week or more. That's enough for most folks but you can use public charging to supplement when needed. Installing conduit circuits and outlets is simple and cheap; no charge stations needed.
  • 2manyvettes Tadge was at the Corvette Corral at the Rolex 24 hour sports car race at the end of January 2023. During the Q&A after his remarks someone stood up and told him "I will never buy an electric Corvette." His response? "I will never sell you an electric Corvette." Take that Fwiw.
  • Socrates77 They're pinching pennies for the investors like always, greed has turned GM into a joke of an old corporate American greed.
  • Analoggrotto looking at this takes me right back to the year when “CD-ROM” first entered public lexicon
  • Alan My comment just went into the cloud.I do believe its up to the workers and I also see some simplistic comments against unionisation. Most of these are driven by fear and insecurity, an atypical conservative trait.The US for a so called modern and wealthy country has poor industrial relation practices with little protection for the worker, so maybe unionisation will advance the US to a genuine modern nation that looks after its workers well being, standard of living, health and education.Determining pay is measured using skill level, training level and risk associated with the job. So, you can have a low skilled job with high risk and receive a good pay, or have a job with lots of training and the pay is so-so.Another issue is viability of a business. If you have a hot dog stall and want $5 a dog and people only want to pay $4 you will go broke. This is why imported vehicles are important so people can buy more affordable appliances to drive to and from work.Setting up a union is easier than setting up work conditions and pay.