Blue Is the New Green Is the New Bullshit

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: August 10th, 2009

blue is the new green is the new bullshit

Just as GM is prepping a green themed “230” Volt hype campaign, comes word from Automotive News [sub] that green is so 2003. “For all the talk about green vehicles,” intones the industry rag, “blue is the new color of choice to embody clean driving.” Did you think that Mercedes BlueTec and VW/Audi’s “AdBlue” names came from the blue tint of their diesel-emissions-treating urea fluids? Nope. “The color blue is associated with freshness, dynamism and lightness,” say VW flacks. And according to Hans Tempel, president of Mercedes-Benz Japan, “Blue perfectly encapsulates the cool, clear sky of a world unsullied by greenhouse gases.” Gagging yet? The best eco-chromatic marketing analysis awaits post-jump.

One point we will concede to Tempel, namely that “‘green’ is a term that is heavily occupied. You’ve got to find a new term in a global brand,” he explains. Fair enough, but if Toyota uses blue for its Prius badging, Hyundai brands its clean cars as “Blue Drive,” and Nissan’s new Leaf EV is blue-themed, how long will the blue-as-green branding stay fresh? Especially when the alleged originality of the color coding is drowned in the hemming-and-hueing of relentless marketing-speak. Like this bon mot from Simon Humphries, general manager for global design at Toyota: “blue is green with technology. It’s a clean and fresh color, and I think that’s what people are looking for.”

But, as usual, the best explanation for the blueshift (trademark pending) comes not from the designers and company toadies, but from the interpretive power of the media. Automotive News [sub] breaks it down:

“To its champions, blue is Earth-friendly in a high-tech, “Star Trek” way. It’s futuristic, evoking the dilithium crystals that effortlessly power the starship Enterprise at warp speed. Green, by contrast, is Earth-friendly in a granola way. Like a hippy bus running on hemp seed oil.”

Got that? There will be a test.

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 16 comments

Rpn453 on Aug 11, 2009
Gagging yet? Yes.

Like Reply
Vento97 on Aug 11, 2009

ATTACK OF THE MARKETING-DROIDS!!!! Coming soon to a dealership near you!!!

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”