Cash4Clunkers (a.k.a. CARS): Bait and Switch?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Last night, I watched a Flood Automotive Group TV ad touting “Cash for Clunkers.” The message was simple: Uncle Sam’s got $1 billion for clunkers. Come get $4500 for your clunker. Not a single word about which vehicles qualify for the money. It didn’t even refer viewers to a website for details— like this ad for C4C “designated” dealer Phil Fitts Ford. A quick ring ’round twenty dealers nationwide shows a definite “reluctance” to discuss the particulars of the CARS program over the phone. “I’m sure your vehicle will qualify,” a Chrysler dealer told me re: my theoretical 2005 Chrysler 300. “Bring it down and we’ll have a look.”

“We haven’t received the guidelines yet,” a Chevy dealer said, in response to “how much money can I get for my 2002 Honda Civic?” Only one dealer said my non-applicable vehicle was non-applicable. In other words, thousands of car dealers are ready, willing and able to commit the sin of omission; luring old cars owners to the dealership with the prospect of “free” government cash—for which the customer’s vehicle doesn’t qualify.

Then there’s the other “danger.” What’s to stop dealers from saying “Well, your wreck doesn’t qualify for the government program, but I tell you what, WE’LL give you $5000 towards a new Enclave”? I heard those very words from the mouth of a mid-Western Buick dealer.

The DOT is making sure that traded-in clunkers qualify for the federal rebate. They’re doing their level best to ensure that the culled clunkers are disabled. But who’s watching dealers at the sharp end, protecting consumers against the same old fraud and misrepresentation? The same people doing it now. And look what a great job they’re doing.

While I applaud the DOT for their Herculean efforts to create a new, effective, efficient and ethically-administered federal program, and I’m a firm believer in Caveat emptor, CARS puts some of America’s most economically challenged consumers in the dealer crosshairs. Again.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Steven Lang Steven Lang on Jul 17, 2009

    You're right. We got the GC when my wife was 8 months pregnant with kid #2. It averaged around 20 mpg which is more than the Windstars and Freestars my wife drove once I started selling cars on the side.

  • Donpbenz Donpbenz on Jul 27, 2009

    Massachusetts law prohibits merchants from using "bait and switch" tactics. They may not advertise one product and then try to steer consumers to another product by refusing to show the advertised item, dispariging it or it's warranty or failing to provide a legally sufficient quantity. Under MA general Laws Chapter 93A and 940 CMR 6.06 a seller may be guilty of false advertising ( or of bait and switch tactics) if it advertises a particular item and then fails to provide sufficient quantity to meet reasonable demand. The ad must clearly state limited supplies and that no rain checks are available. It can offer a comparable substitute or it can prove shipping delays. This is precisely what happened to me today at a KIA dealership. When I purchased the Boston Herald that afternoon the ad still appeared. It is dissappointing that NONE of the dealers were able to produce a vehicle at the advertised price.

  • SCE to AUX With these items under the pros:[list][*]It's quick, though it seems to take the powertrain a second to get sorted when you go from cruising to tromping on it.[/*][*]The powertrain transitions are mostly smooth, though occasionally harsh.[/*][/list]I'd much rather go electric or pure ICE I hate herky-jerky hybrid drivetrains.The list of cons is pretty damning for a new vehicle. Who is buying these things?
  • Jrhurren Nissan is in a sad state of affairs. Even the Z mentioned, nice though it is, will get passed over 3 times by better vehicles in the category. And that’s pretty much the story of Nissan right now. Zero of their vehicles are competitive in the segment. The only people I know who drive them are company cars that were “take it or leave it”.
  • Jrhurren I rented a RAV for a 12 day vacation with lots of driving. I walked away from the experience pretty unimpressed. Count me in with Team Honda. Never had a bad one yet
  • ToolGuy I don't deserve a vehicle like this.
  • SCE to AUX I see a new Murano to replace the low-volume Murano, and a new trim level for the Rogue. Yawn.
Next