Stop The Presses: Chrysler Records 25 Percent Sales Increase In April

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: May 3rd, 2010

stop the presses chrysler records 25 percent sales increase in april

Chrysler saw its sales increase 25 percent last month, for its best year-over-year performance in “almost five years,” according to the company. On the other hand, sales improved only 3 percent compared to last March’s results and only barely met Chrysler’s 95k minimum sales goal (at 95,703 units). Still, this is the best sales news the company has had since well before emerging from bankruptcy. For those who think Chrysler has a shot at survival, this is the first evidence in a long time that actually supports their optimism.

The Chrysler brand saw a 61 percent sales improvement, as Sebring volume jumped 207 percent to 4,053 units. Town & Country sales rose 80 percent to 13,367 units and 300 sales improved 40 percent to 4,127 units. PT Cruiser fell 41 percent to 838 units.

Jeep sales fell by 25 units, but weak sales of its more profitable Wrangler (-11 percent), Grand Cherokee (-6 percent) and Commander (-20 percent) units were offset by strong Compass (+103 percent) and Patriot (+21 percent) sales.

Avenger followed its Sebring twin, up 340 percent to 6,000 units even. Charger sales growth echoed the 300’s increase as well, rising 90 percent to 8,944 units. Challenger sales recovered as well, rising 42 percent to 3,713 units. Caravan swung upwards as well, recording 10,435 units for a 56 percent increase. Caliber was also up 44 percent, and Nitro was up 14 percent, as Dodge hit a 61 percent improvement over last April’s sales.

Chrysler’s biggest problem area continues to be the Ram pickup. The relatively new truck (including the brand-new Heavy Duty models) saw sales slide 24 percent to 13,665 units of its best-selling and most profitable vehicle.Dakota improved 36 percent, but still recorded only 1,192 units. As TTAC has explained, Chrysler needs those Ram sales to pick up soon if it wants to build on this momentum and return positive financial results that don’t depend wholly on cost-cutting.

#Chrysler #Dodge #Jeep #NewCars #Sales

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 31 comments

Mjz on May 04, 2010

They should call all the trucks Dodge RAM, and maybe eventually go to simply RAM, they moved too fast on this and the market is not responding well. Their truck sales should be much better because the big Ram trucks are pretty nice.

Like Reply
Stencha Klaus on May 04, 2010

I love that picture. Chrysler made awesome cars in the 60's. Quality, reliability and performance-something totally forgotten in this age of computerized junkboxes. I have owned a 67 Newport, 69 Newport,69 Fury, 64 Windsor, 66 New Yorker and 64 300. These cars make their new offerings look like complete junk.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)