Jaguars. Soon Made in China

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Over the next few years, life in the UK is going to be pretty – austere. The Centre-Right government has been in power barely a month, and already they’ve slashed the budget by £6.2 billion. That was just the scalpel, wait till the axe comes. So, with a possible second recession in the offing, it’s time for some good news. And here it is…

The BBC reports that Tata-owned Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) is going to start assembling their vehicles in China. “We will need to manufacture at least 2 models in China,” said Carl-Peter Forster, JLR’s Chief Executive. “We’ll take 1 to 2 years to set it up, first we’ll need a partner.” That’s right, JLR isn’t above Chinese law, and they have to look for a Chinese joint venture partner. Then, the joint venture needs to be approved by the government. (Not that they usually are against it.)

Why China? Jags and Land Rovers are moving. Much of the growth came from China, where Jaguar sales rose 38 percent and Land Rover sales rose 55 percent during the year. India is also strong.

Mr Forster was quick to quell any fears that going to China might take any work from the UK based factories. Despite the growth in China and India, Forster said that either countries would “never be the centre for Jaguar Land Rover, it will remain in the UK. Most of the volume growth in these markets will benefit the UK operations”. Aha. By the way, JLR will produce Land Rovers in India next year.

At the same time, Forster is pushing for the closure of one of the factories in the UK, in the name of the almighty efficiency: “We are talking about having one efficient operation rather than 2 inefficient operations said Mr Forster, “We are not necessarily talking about getting rid of people.” Not necessarily?

An extra 1,000 jobs will be created in the UK – temporary jobs. Forster had an answer for that, too: “It takes a year or two before the jobs become permanent,”. With last financial year sales for JLR at 193,982 and with JLR expecting to top 200,000, the future looks rosy for JLR in Carl-Peter Forster’s eyes.

Forster has more ambitious plans. He wants to defy Newton. “The centre of gravity for the European auto industry is on the Continent and we have to pull the centre of gravity towards the UK.”

Start pulling, Pete! Anything that boosts exports and secures jobs for the UK is good in my eyes. With the upcoming budget cuts the UK faces, any foreign money is welcome. Even if Mao’s head is on it.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Jun 01, 2010

    Wait you ripped a lot of this out of a BBC article? Oh dear.... They aren't exactly known for being on the ball. Autocar and Autoblog have some good coverage on this. They managed to find out that JLR have at least 4 new models coming and that's before we even count Project Icon (the Defender replacement). To be fair about the TTAC article, it's more the tone of it I disagree with than anything else. Why not mention the list of new models JLR will be building and the 1 billion dollars a year TATA have said they will inject into JLR's operations to build new models. Someone reading this might take a lot of negative vibes away, but the truth is the future for JLR is looking more rosey now than it ever has. That deserves a mention. As does the fact that JLR quickly returned to profit, with very little in the way of government handouts. Why didn't TTAC mention the four or five new models? Bet you won't answer that....

    • Cammy Corrigan Cammy Corrigan on Jun 01, 2010

      I didn't mention the four or five models because it wasn't really relevant. The fact is, JLR are growing and I'm pleased. Both for the UK and JLR. If you read TTAC, you'll known I'm a huge JLR fan (my avatar is a clue). However, healthy scepticism is a need for working at TTAC. Remember, CEO and chief executives always like to spin things. Also, for the record, Tata were angling for government loans. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7789055.stm

  • Amit Das Amit Das on Jun 02, 2010

    The news just keeps getting better... or worse, depending on which continent you live in. Mr. Ratan Tata is a silent raider, he is doing a Daimler-Chrysler without the German arrogance. Unfortunately for the British, JLR is on its way to being an Asian carmarker. Tsk, tsk... hopefully Mr. Tata didn't take his grandfather's view of the British Empire to heart... "Jaguar-Land Rover to soon run on Tata Motors engineering" The move to marry engine operations is the brainchild of the new leadership team at Tata Motors under Carl-Peter Forster, which has been vocal about the increased importance of India and China in the future of JLR. A Tata Motors spokesman confirmed the move to jointly develop engines. “As India is a preferred source of production, we’ll source the engines here with the design left for the JLR team,” he said. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/auto/automobiles/Jaguar-Land-Rover-to-soon-run-on-Tata-Motors-engineering/articleshow/5996626.cms

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next