GM's 90-Day Progress Report

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

90 days out of bankruptcy, GM is taking a moment to explain just how well the turnaround thing is going. Or, to use the PR-present tense, how GM “Accelerates its Focus on Customers, Cars and Culture.” CEO Fritz Henderson explains in the report press release (PDF):

Over the past ninety days since we created the new GM, we’ve already launched a number of new, fuel-efficient, highly successful cars and crossovers; introduced a new marketing campaign that highlights our best-in-class fuel economy, quality, warranty and safety performance; sworn in a new Board of Directors; and overhauled our management. We are taking aggressive actions and moving quickly to transform our culture into one that is truly customer focused

Everything you need to know about this exercise in corporate affirmations (I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!) can be found in the slide (above) titled “Concerns” from the report’s accompanying presentation (PDF). Nothing about the crisis surrounding Daewoo. Nothing about a steady erosion in sales that no marketing effort has been able to turn around. Nothing about binge-and-purge inventory “management.” Nothing about the near-impossibility of showing a profit by the planned IPO. In short, GM glossed over its issues like a 12 year old with her first stick of Lip Smackers.

Little encapsulates GM’s “we’re still changing but everything’s fine” line as well as the departure of Mark LaNeve. Hated by many dealers, and the architect of years of dismal sales results, LaNeve is a perfect symbol of old GM (but hey, what senior exec at New GM isn’t?). And on the one hand, GM is using his departure as an opportunity to say things like “we are taking aggressive actions and moving quickly to transform our culture into one that is truly customer focused.” In fact, Henderson went as far as to say “I do think there is a benefit to bringing in outsider. I think we would benefit from fresh perspective.” But Henderson also refused to use the opportunity to draw a line in the sand on sales results, preferring to let his euphemism that “Mark’s going to join another company to pursue an interest outside the auto industry,” dangle ominously. At least it would have been ominous, had LaNeve not overseen eight years of weak results before being allowed to “pursue other opportunities” post-bankruptcy.

The rest of the report is full of cheery optimism, that seems more based in turn of phrase and cognitive dissonance than reality. Under the heading “Improved Sales Performance,” The General notes “the company’s U.S. market share was 19.5 percent in the third quarter, consistent with the first half of the year. U.S. market share in 2008 was 22.1 percent.” How is that “improved” in any way? The dealer wind-down portion says nothing of ongoing meetings between dealers, GM, Chrysler and congress which have the potential to restore lost franchises, and undo GM’s dealer cull. Sales of the Hummer and Opel brands are noted as “ progressing,” despite one rejection of the Hummer deal by China, and threats of EU intervention in the Opel transaction (not to mention potential negative effects of the Opel sale, should it go through).

And this optimism isn’t going away. In preparation for its IPO, and “as a newly created entity, GM is continuing to implement “fresh-start” reporting, which encompasses the determination of the fair value of its assets and liabilities, by March 31, 2010.” And then comes the IPO. GM has proved that it can ignore looming problems literally for decades, so why not a few months? There’s always time to worry about things after investors re-prop-up the company.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Mach1 Mach1 on Oct 08, 2009

    GM announced yesterday that they still have 10,000 too many heads on the staff that need to go by year end, Anyone think this won;t be disruptive?

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Oct 08, 2009

    "Bunter1 : October 7th, 2009 at 4:20 pm Autosavant-I have seen two road tests with mpg on the NuNox (Edmunds and CR). Can’t vouch for Edmunds method but they did say that they expected better (21 mpg, they usually get closer to the EPA est. apparently). CR uses a consistent method with multiple drivers and they got lower mpg (21 mpg)" I saw the same CR test yesterday, your 21 is average ,not highway. CR did get 30 highway, which is quite good, if not exactly 32. They probably were doing 55 .. or less than 65 anyway.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next