Tesla Notches a Win in Early Lawsuit for Deadly Autopilot Crash

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Tesla has seemed to be in constant legal peril over the last couple of years, as several high-profile crashes involving its semi-autonomous driving functions have led to investigations and lawsuits. Even so, the automaker was victorious in one of its first trials, which ended earlier this week.


The trial, which ended on October 31, was for allegations that its Autopilot driver assist tech caused a fatal crash. Despite its name and the misleading title of Tesla’s other assistance system, Full Self-Driving, none of the automaker’s technologies make its vehicles self-driving. The names came under scrutiny in the trial, with the prosecution asking a Tesla engineer if he felt the automaker created them to give the impression that vehicles were truly autonomous. He gave a “no” answer, but the U.S. Department of Justice has an open criminal probe focused on the topic, so we’ll probably hear more about that soon.


This lawsuit ended with the jury deciding that the driver was ultimately liable and that the Tesla did not have a manufacturing defect, but the issues they were asked to sort through were confusing and convoluted. Though some suits focus on how Autopilot is designed and its potential for abuse, the jury in this latest case only had to evaluate whether a defect impacted the vehicle’s steering system.


Tesla was pleased with the result, saying that its vehicles make the roads safer. The decision also illustrates an interesting view by the jury that the driver is ultimately responsible, even when the vehicle is doing most of the work. The question of liability is significant and is one of the biggest threats to autonomous vehicles. No automaker is going to jump at the opportunity to be sued for millions if someone abuses an autonomous vehicle, so it will be interesting to see how the rest of Tesla’s cases play out.


[Image: TierneyMJ via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Nov 01, 2023

    Automotive jury trials are weird.

    (I know this because I got rejected as a prospective juror for one. LOL.)

  • Crown Crown on Nov 01, 2023

    It wasn't a "defect", it was false advertisement- "Full Self Driving"

  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
  • Peter Buying an EV from Toyota is like buying a Bible from Donald Trump. Don’t be surprised if some very important parts are left out.
  • Sheila I have a 2016 Kia Sorento that just threw a rod out of the engine case. Filed a claim for new engine and was denied…..due to a loop hole that was included in the Class Action Engine Settlement so Hyundai and Kia would be able to deny a large percentage of cars with prematurely failed engines. It’s called the KSDS Improvement Campaign. Ever hear of such a thing? It’s not even a Recall, although they know these engines are very dangerous. As unknowing consumers load themselves and kids in them everyday. Are their any new Class Action Lawsuits that anyone knows of?
  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
Next