Surveys Suggest EV Owners Still Annoyed With Charging Infrastructure

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky


There’s been an increase in reports of inoperable charging stations intended for EVs this year, with the data coinciding with J.D. Power’s annual Electric Vehicle Experience Public Charging Study. Despite EV sales continuing to climb, the survey showed that people are actually becoming less satisfied with charging stations overall. 

"Not only is the availability of public charging still an obstacle, but EV owners continue to be faced with charging station equipment that is inoperable," elaborated Brent Gruber, executive director of global automotive at J.D. Power.

A survey of more than 11,000 battery electric and plug-in hybrid owners indicated that consumer satisfaction with Level 2 public charging declined from 643 to 633 last year on a 1,000-point scale. Meanwhile, the public’s satisfaction with DC fast chargers stayed roughly the same – though, at 674 out of a possible 1,000, there is certainly room for improvement.  

The J.D. Power survey similarly revealed that around 20 percent of respondents were unable to charge their vehicle when visiting a station. That matches what we’ve seen from other studies, right down to the number-one issue being malfunctioning or completely inoperable chargers. 

The industry is getting pretty deep into electrification at this stage. Even Dodge is floating a hypothetical all-electric replacement of the Charger this week to test if die-hard Mopar fans are willing to embrace simulated exhaust noises. That doesn’t mean there’s necessarily anything wrong with the concept Daytona SRT EV. But this is coming from a company whose current branding relies predominantly upon tire smoke and monstrous V8 engines producing oodles of power for less than you might expect. It’s actually kind of shocking to see Dodge consider getting rid of HEMI engines after they helped restore the brand’s identity.

Automakers see the upside of electrification (e.g. government subsidies, fewer regulatory fines, a leaner workforce, subscription-based features, service centers seeing less competition, etc.) and don’t want to be the last company to make the swap in the event that EVs end up dominating the market. That said, almost every company also seems to have overlooked the fact that the charging infrastructure remains their biggest obstacle. With electric cars typically having shorter ranges than their gasoline or diesel counterparts, customers are required to either charge at home overnight (a perk) or find a charging station out in the wild (not a perk). 

Tesla made massive investments to build its own proprietary charging network. But most other companies don’t seem to want to make those kinds of commitments – often teaming up with the government, utilities, and private companies to get things done. For example, Volvo was one of the first global brands to announce a planned transition to an all-electric lineup. But the latest effort the company has made in regard to strengthening the EV infrastructure was to buddy up with Starbucks on a pilot program seeking to install “up to” 60 fast chargers at 15 Starbucks stores across a 1,350-mile route from Denver to Seattle. Starbucks will ideally see more foot traffic from EV owners that have to wait for their vehicle to charge and Volvo gets to look like it’s addressing the problem of there being an insufficient number of charging stations. 

“We want to send drivers to where there are the amenities that they expect — a clean restroom, a snack, a well-lit parking lot," Tripi told Automotive News in a recent interview. "Who better to do it with than Starbucks, given their footprint?"

I guess Tripi hasn’t been to a Starbucks bathroom recently. Changes in policy have made hitting one up a test of one’s good fortune. But the company has recently decided to make them less public in the hope that patrons don’t lose their appetite after stopping to relieve themselves. Gross bathrooms or not, Volvo probably just wanted a business that could share the burden of installing and maintaining EV charging stations and had a good sense of where its customers tend to go already – Tripi even hinted at that during the interview before making an incredibly important point. 

"Installing fast chargers is an expensive investment," he continued. "We need to ensure that there's value in it."

Automakers have been dumping billions into developing all-electric vehicles, so tossing billions more into building the supporting infrastructure may not be all that appealing at this juncture. The financial risk posed if the EV market implodes is absolutely massive. However, ignoring the matter seems short-sighted if brands like Volvo actually want to sell EVs. Tesla gained a lot by establishing its own charging network and conveying to its customer base that they could have faith in the company because it was actually putting all the pieces into place for electrification to happen. Its charging stations also seem to have a better reputation for uptime, perhaps because Tesla has so much skin in the game already. 

Truth be told, the J.D. Power survey is fairly kind to the industry. Despite EV owners complaining that broken charging stations are routine, overall satisfaction still managed to stay above 60 percent. By contrast, a recent CDK Global survey found that 60 percent of respondents reported concerns about charging network availability, with almost half saying they’d wait till they had a garage to buy an EV due to concerns with public charging. In Europe, energy rationing has also become a concern. Some are wondering if “smart meters” that give utilities and the government the ability to throttle power usage could spell trouble for electric vehicles. 

But it’s hard to get a wealth of reliable data on the public perception because the world has been inundated with reports from EV manufacturers, lobbying groups, and the companies building the charging stations. Here’s one from Plug In America claiming EV drivers just love their cars and that 90 percent plan on getting one as their next vehicle. But even that survey still failed to avoid just how annoyed most people are with the modern charging infrastructure. 

I anecdotally fall into the majority here and have a sneaking suspicion that most EV advocates rarely drive themselves long distances. Unless you have a penchant for combustion-engine vehicles or live in an extreme climate, electrics work well enough for most daily duties. But taking one for a prolonged road trip exposes you to the plight of charging stations. Sometimes the only thing to complain about is the minutes lost while the vehicle takes to move electrons. But encountering a bad charger seems an inevitability based on the current condition of most stations and you don’t always know that there’s been a problem until you’ve returned to the vehicle to check. This absolutely has to be addressed by the industry if manufacturers seriously expect EVs to supplant gasoline-driven automobiles. 


[Image: VisualArtStudio/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • Calrson Fan Calrson Fan on Aug 20, 2022

    I've had my Volt for going on 6 years now. Which of course is My DD. I completely understand the ups and downs of an EV, especially in cold weather climates. I really don't care about your driving habits because they are not my driving habits. As I said before, EV's in their current state are not replacements for ICE powered cars and light trucks. No matter how much you would like them to be. They can be a great choice as a 2nd or 3rd vehicle in a multi-car household.

    • EBFlex EBFlex on Aug 20, 2022

      The Volt was a brilliant car. But that’s because it offered the absolute best of both worlds. A useable EV range for daily errands and a small ICE engine to supplement when you run out of electricity that effectively made it a very efficient hybrid. PHEVs are the answer. But instead we are being forced into these god awful EVs.




  • Skippity Skippity on Aug 20, 2022

    Plug-in hybrids are likely the better fit for most.

    • EBFlex EBFlex on Aug 20, 2022

      100%. All the benefits of an EV without any of the major drawbacks.


  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next