Rivian Receiving $1.5 Billion Incentive Package from Georgia

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Rivian Automotive Inc, purveyor of the all-electric R1T and R1S, will receive $1.5 billion in incentives from state and local governments to build a new manufacturing facility in Georgia. Eager to become home to the company’s planned $5 billion assembly plant, the state is offering a comprehensive incentive package that includes tax breaks. The government has a few stipulations, however.

Under the new agreement, Rivian’s factory would be required to produce 7,500 jobs and its existing investment target by 2028 to receive the full $1.5 billion. That includes a sizable battery production site and may explain why the state is offering up the largest corporate incentivization package in its history.

Georgia’s economic development commissioner, Pat Wilson, was quoted by Reuters as saying the upcoming facility represented a major victory by placing the region “at the forefront of the electric vehicle revolution.”

Despite numerous EV startups being accused of ginning up their business model to spur investments, local governments are still keen on encouraging manufacturing — especially if it happens to relate to the tech sector. While Rivian failed to meet its production goals in 2021, lost a bid to replace the USPs aged fleet, and has seen its share price decline since its November IPO, it’s also managed to deliver functional vehicles while some of its peers have not.

From Reuters:

The Georgia plant, located east of Atlanta would be Rivian’s second U.S. assembly plant, after its plant in Normal, Illinois.

The company, which is 20 [percent] owned by Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O), has launched three vehicle models in the U.S. — its R1T pickup, R1S SUV and EDV delivery van for Amazon — but has struggled ramping up production amid supply chain constraints, including a shortage of semiconductors.

Wall Street investors have been disappointed with the company’s progress and vehicle order numbers, and Rivian shares have dropped more than 75 [percent] since the company went public in mid-November.

Local residents living east of Atlanta have voiced concerns that the new facility would upset their quality of life. However, the State of Georgia seems eager to see new jobs arrive and has stated that the project will follow “locally required standards pertaining to water quality, groundwater recharge and runoff, and local ordinances.”

Rivian’s Georgia plant will be quite a bit larger than the 5,000-person facility in Illinois (pictured) and the company believes it can be completed by 2024 if everything goes according to plan. An executive summary of the project is available here for those interested.

“Today marks a milestone in our progress towards the development of our second U.S. manufacturing plant in Georgia as the Economic Development Agreement (EDA) between the Joint Development Authority (JDA) of Jasper, Morgan, Newton, and Walton counties, the State of Georgia and Rivian was approved and signed by all parties,” the automaker stated on Monday. “The long-term economic partnership promises to deliver value to Rivian, the people of Georgia and their kids’ kids’ kids.”

[Image: Rivian]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 51 comments
  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next