Rare Rides: Vanderhall Motor Works and The Venice, Three Wheels Only

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride is presented to you because I saw one in traffic on Wednesday. Unsure what the three-wheeled thing I saw was, I gave a vague description to Twitter and was informed almost immediately that what I’d seen was a Vanderhall Venice. Let’s learn some three-wheel car-bike things.

Rare Rides is not in the habit of covering three-wheeled vehicles (autocycles, if you like) and has done so only once prior via the garbage Pulse Litestar. Vanderhall has been much more successful in its autocycle attempts. Properly known as Vanderhall Motor Works, the small company was founded in 2010 in Provo, which is in Utah. Headed by founder and CEO Steve Hall, Vanderhall has (thus far) made only three-wheeled autocycles for track and road use. The first five years the company existed, it didn’t build anything at all. Hall, a professional CAD designer, spent the time developing prototypes.

In 2015 the company’s first car debuted and wore the name Laguna. The new two-seater wore simple bodywork and had an optional roof. It was classified as a motorcycle and went on sale in 2016. In three different trims, the Laguna was powered by a modified version of the 1.4-liter GM Ecoflex engine (180 HP) from the Chevy Cruze, and a six-speed automatic.

The next year the company’s second offering – Venice – was announced. It entered production in Utah in 2017, and remains on sale today. As a development on what the Laguna started, the Venice has an overall length of just 140.9 inches and a width of 70.1 inches. Strictly a paved road vehicle, Venice has just 3.94 inches of ground clearance. The whole package is just 44.1 inches tall. For reference, a Chevy Sonic (RIP) was 59.7 inches tall. Underneath the Venice uses an aluminum chassis, with a composite ABS plastic body on top.

The Venice continued initially with the 1.4-liter engine from the Laguna, but shortly thereafter made a switch to a 1.5-liter inline-four engine, also from GM. Still in use presently, the 1.5 has direct injection, variable valve timing, and a turbocharger. It’s good for 194 horsepower and is paired to a six-speed automatic. There are disc brakes at each wheel which can be upgraded to Brembos, as well as standard ABS. The suspension is a racy pushrod setup. The Venice is very lightweight at 1,465 pounds but does include niceties like a standard Bluetooth module, heated seats, and cruise control.

But there are no airbags and no roof. the Vanderhall qualifies as a three-wheel motorcycle according to the NHTSA but states here and there may call it a car, a motorcycle, or in 31 states, auto cycle. Owners may or may not need a helmet depending on the state. It’s in the narrow three-wheeled enthusiast vehicle segment with the very expensive Morgan 3 Wheeler ($45,000+) and the dorky Polaris Slingshot ($20,000+). Its pricing falls in the middle of those two, and ranges from $29,950 to $36,950 via three different trim levels.

The company introduced another variant of Venice in 2019, the more upscale Carmel. Sold alongside Venice, Carmel has the same power as but more luxurious features (like doors) and an optional removable canopy-type roof. Carmel starts where Venice pricing ends, and costs up to $47,000. Vanderhall is also working on EV three-wheelers and introduced an electric version of the Venice called Edison2 (not in production). There was also a Speedster version of the Venice that had only one seat.

Vanderhall’s first four-wheeled vehicle is in development and is an off-roading EV called the Brawley. As late as September last year the company called it the Navarro, but that name may have been just a bit too close to Nissan’s Navara pickup. Seating four, the Brawley promises 404 horsepower via an electric motor at each wheel, and a 200-mile range with prices starting at $34,950.

Reservations are open for the Brawley presently, and you can buy a Venice or Carmel from your local Vanderhall sales center.

[Images: Vanderhall]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next