Rare Rides Icons: The History of Imperial, More Than Just a Car (Part X)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

This 10th installment of our Imperial coverage finds us at a turning point in its styling. Virgil Exner had been fired but was allowed to stay on as a design consultant at Chrysler. Exner’s immediate replacement was Elwood Engel, who’d designed the 1961 Lincoln Continental and then jumped ship when he was not promoted at Ford. Chrysler execs wanted out of Exner’s winged, googly-eyed stylistic cave, and Engel took the aged D-body in a very different direction for 1964.

Underneath, the 1964 Imperial was still the same D-body it had been since the 1957 model year. Still, a body-on-frame holdout as the rest of the Chrysler and company lineup went unibody from 1960 onward. The renewed Engel-designed Imperial for 1964 wore the Series VY1 (M, H) designation, as there was no longer a “base model” Imperial Custom that used an L as its series indicator. The revised Imperial’s most notable styling characteristic was its resemblance to the Lincoln Continental. Given the sales slump Imperial had experienced under the last handful of Exner years, executives at Chrysler were undoubtedly on board with a Lincoln-esque look.

At the front end, the expected set of four round headlamps was still present, this time encased in a mesh chrome grille, split into two pieces and reminiscent of the Imperial from 1962. The grilles had a heavily chromed surround, but the look was more upright and horizontal than before. The bumper was slimmer and had less ornamentation, and “battering ram” detailing appeared at either corner of the front bumper for the first time. The hood of the ’64 was much flatter than before and used minimal chrome trim. Exner’s sweeping body line trim strip was replaced by a more horizontal strip carried along the almost singular body crease. Said trim now ended vertically at the front bumper instead of wrapping horizontally around the hood. Imperial script logos were still present, but were moved lower on the front fenders, and made smaller and less dramatic. LeBaron trims said LeBaron on their fenders and had an Imperial logo.

The Imperial’s rear was changed dramatically for 1964 and adopted a much simpler look than before. Chrome trim was less prevalent, and body line chrome ended vertically at the bumper, much like the front end. Imperial logos here changed from script to block lettering (like a Continental), and the integrated false continental kit bulge moved from the trunk lid to the bumper and was square instead of circular.

A large winged Imperial logo appeared in the center of the bumper and served as the fuel filler door so as not to disturb the smooth body lines. The bumper also mirrored the battering rams of the front. Tail lamps were rocket-like and pointed, now horizontal instead of vertical, and integrated into the bumper where they’d never been before. Rooflines weren’t changed a lot from the 1963 Imperial, as they were one of the changes Engel first applied. Though it looked plenty different, the 1964 imperial was the same 227.8-inch length as the prior year. Width dropped slightly from 81.7 to an even 80 inches. Height remained the same as before at 56.8 inches.

Things were simplified on the interior as well. The steering wheel was no longer a square shape, and the dash moved on from a finned appearance that saw near-vertical button pods at either side of the wheel. Instead, the dash had a uniform horizontal look, with full-width chromed grille trim in vertical slats. Buttons were simpler and arranged under the horizontal speedometer in a straight line. Gone as well as the space age electroluminescent dash lighting (a complicated, five-layer design), but that was probably more a cost-saving than a design need.

Imperial’s pricing remained steady over the years, and in 1964 a Crown four-door asked $5,581 ($50,201 adj.) while a four-door in LeBaron trim was $6,455 ($58,063 adj.). The very expensive and hand-built Crown Imperial Limousine was still in production and sold 10 examples in ’64 at a cost of $18,500 ($166,409 adj.).

On the technology and luxury front, rear window defroster vents became standard equipment. Also made standard were power windows, and steering wheels had an optional adjustment for greater driver comfort.

All hardtop Imperials offered a vinyl roof option, and trim levels were simplified this year. The base Crown (M) carried no other trim name, while the upscale version was still the LeBaron (H). Base Crowns were available as two-door and four-door hardtops, as well as the convertible. LeBaron was restricted to four-door hardtop guise. The Crown convertible came with additional standard equipment like power seats, steering, brakes, and a padded dash.

The aging D-body received no notable mechanical changes for 1964, as the generation approached its end of life. Still under the hood was the 413 cubic-inch (6.8L) Wedge style V8 that debuted in 1959, and the TorqueFlite A727 from 1962. Despite the lack of mechanical advancement, the Engel styling did the trick: Imperial sales jumped from 14,121 in 1963 to 23,295 in 1964, an increase of over 60 percent. Imagine Exner’s chagrin as he finished out his time at Chrysler, relegated to a consultant’s office.

The Imperial in its new clothes was reviewed favorably by the automotive press of the day and earned a reputation as being nice to drive; more of a driver’s car than its domestic barge competition. Given the renewed sales success and the age of its platform, the Imperial had only minimal expected changes for 1965 as it became Series AY1 (M,H). The quad headlamps were set into their own chromed bezels instead of the grille itself and had glass covers over them with an etched horizontal slat design.

The grille lost the painted split in the middle and swapped for a full-width design of vertical and horizontal chromed slats, and four distinct sections separated by a chrome crosshair. The rear end carried over from 1964. Inside, the push-button transmission was tossed for a column shifter. Interiors also benefitted from the addition of century-old Claro walnut trim (Northern California black walnut). Height increased slightly over the prior year, to 57.2 inches, making it the second tallest D-body since its debut year in 1957 (57.5″). Sales in this carryover year fell to 16,422

In 1966 it was time for a D-body hurrah, as Imperial was on its last independent platform for some time. The Series BY1 (M,H) carried the same headlamp design as before, but etched glass became plain glass with dual 24-karat gold bands around the edges. The grille used a slats design once again but looked busier overall as the slats became smaller. The grille was separated into 18 different sections instead of four. The 1967 Imperial was one of the last cars (if not the last) on the market that used a wrap-around windshield design.

The rear was adjusted slightly in ’66, as the continental bulge on the trunk lid got softer and less pronounced – a sign the feature was falling out of fashion. Imperial block lettering at the rear reverted to an Imperial cursive script, much more subdued than prior scripts. Taillights grew nearly twice as large this year, as the previously integrated reversing lamps moved down into the bumper and resided as odd squares. Luxury customers were beginning to expect more wood trim, so much more walnut appeared on Imperial’s dashboard. And in its final year, the D-body Imperial received a new engine: The Wedge 413 was replaced by a Wedge 440 (7.2L). Horsepower increased from 340 to 350, and the 440 would be the last of Chrysler’s RB series engines. Sales dropped slightly to 13,752 in this final year.

The third generation imperial was all-new for 1967, and Elwood Engel got to style Chrysler’s flagship from the ground up this time. More on that in Part XI.

[Images: Imperial]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Lakeview1002 Lakeview1002 on Dec 22, 2021

    The 64 thru 66 Imperials we’re well built, graceful cars. And still competitive with with their contemporaries. What the article doesn’t touch upon is the severe financial issues Chrysler Corp was facing in the early 60s because of the styling misses starting with the 1961 models and disastrous downsizing of the 62 thru 64 Dodge and Plymouth standard/ full size cars. They lost serious market share. Little money was left for the low volume Imperial. The ‘64 Imperial was originally planned for ‘63, but delayed until ‘64, and a new windshield and A Pillar design was cancelled. This then led to the short 2 year run for the ‘67/‘68 Imperial.

    • La834 La834 on Dec 23, 2021

      The '63 New Yorker was originally designed to be an Imperial. Other than fendertop gunsight taillights that got deleted, little was changed to turn it into a NYer.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Dec 26, 2021

    Note the influence the '61 Continental and '64 Imperial had on the Cadillac de Ville. By 1965, the tail fins on the de Ville was near horizontal. Minimal ornaments on the coke bottle sides, more angular in nature, less bulges and flairs. One of the few time that FMC and Chrysler had influence on GM.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next