Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Ford CEO Calls for U.S. Battery Production

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Wednesday, Ford CEO Jim Farley told attendees of the Wolfe Research Auto Conference that the United States needs to start building batteries for the industry’s planned deluge of electric vehicles now that semiconductor shortages have revealed the dangers of needing to source essential components from the other side of the planet.

Farley is likely correct in stating that America really should be able to supply itself, and not just in regard to semiconductor chips. Pandemic-related lockdowns crippled countless industries by upsetting the balance of supply lines. Halfway through 2020, farmers were dumping millions of gallons of milk per day and plowing up fields of eatable vegetables as restaurants were shutdown; factories were idled as part shortages became commonplace; cleaning supplies and disinfectants became impossible to find.

But it’s hard to translate that into sympathy for Ford because, while all of the above was happening, the automaker’s leadership was saying that there was no good reason to manufacture its own batteries.

“The [battery] supply chain has ramped up since Elon [Musk] built his Gigafactory, and so there’s plenty there that does not warrant us to migrate our capital into owning our own factory,” former Ford CEO Jim Hackett said during the company’s second-quarter earnings call, held in August. “There’s no advantage in the ownership in terms of cost or sourcing.”

But that was before South Korea’s SK Innovation lost a courtroom battle with rival LG Chem over intellectual property rights. The International Trade Commission decision bans SK Innovation from importing batteries to the U.S. for ten years, providing a four-year grace period where it can legally import components. Ford has an agreement with the supplier that has it furnishing batteries for the plug-in F-150 that’s coming in 2022.

“We need to bring large-scale battery production to the U.S., and we’ll be talking to the government about [that],” Farley was quoted by Bloomberg as saying during the Wolfe Research Auto Conference. “We can’t go through what we’re doing with chips right now with Taiwan. It’s just too important.”

Leaning on Taiwan to supply an industry that’s cramming chips into every inch of its products during an uncertain period could have also been avoided if the United States maintained. But national self-reliance never seemed to be on the radar of anybody important, not when the work could be done more cheaply elsewhere and components could be shipped in by boat.

President Joe Biden spent part of his week meeting with lawmakers to discuss how to secure supplies of electric vehicle batteries, semiconductors, rare earth metals, and pharmaceuticals — all of which have been in short supply since the pandemic disrupted global trade.

Meanwhile, Ford’s current CEO used his time at the conference to reiterate the corporate strategy. The manufacturer wants to develop new, more affordable EV platforms for use in China and Europe while preparing the United States for its first run of all-electric pickups. It also plans on turning digital services (especially in regard to fleet management) into a more reliable revenue source as it continues to make its vehicles increasingly connected. This opens it up to marketing opportunities and sourcing customer data that have proven highly lucrative, albeit slightly unsavory from our privacy-biased perspective.

Regardless, it sounds like the automaker is going to need a massive amount of semiconductors and batteries that it cannot currently produce for itself. But it’s not going to be fighting for those components in a vacuum, as several of the world’s largest automakers have found themselves in a similar situation where they’ve promised to pivot toward electric vehicles and mobility without having a way of sourcing the necessary parts.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Feb 26, 2021

    Ford doesn't need its own battery factory, but absent that, they would need to cut very large checks to battery suppliers for production lines and assurance of supply agreements. There's obviously risk in doing that because demand for EVs is uncertain. Musk is not afraid to take big risks, so he will either win big, or lose big. So far he's winning.

  • Phreshone Phreshone on Mar 01, 2021

    Like the EPA is going to allow a real competitive battery factory... Hell, they closed down the one lead smelter in the USA about 8 years ago

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next