Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Fails the Moose Test in Dramatic Fashion

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Sweden’s evasive maneuver test, better known as the moose test, is a brutal simulation of what might happen if your lane was suddenly occupied by a giant mammal and you had to get out of the way in a hurry or prepare yourself to become one with the animal. It also happens to be one of the hardest automotive tests to pass, with a long list of models failing to stay on course at highway speeds. In fact, the whole point of the test is to see how fast a vehicle can run the brief gauntlet without running over traffic cones or flipping itself over.

As a result, the cars that typically perform the best tend to be lightweight road huggers with above-average factory rubber. Meanwhile, crossovers and pickups have had particularly poor showings — with Toyota’s RAV4 embarrassing itself rather badly in 2019 after Stockholm’s Teknikens Värld (one of the European publications that made the test world-famous) showed its stability management system was ill-equipped to handle the course. While Toyota went out of its way to remedy the issue with a software update in Europe, recent testing showed the RAV4 PHEV was back to its old tricks… or lack thereof.

On Thursday, Teknikens Värld announced the RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid had failed the moose test in dramatic fashion. Despite the car being engineered to have a quicker turn-in than its non-hybrid brethren, it appeared to be even less predictable while navigating the course. The outlet stated that the AWD crossover was dangerously close to spinning out, noting it was surprising to see any vehicle perform so badly in 2020. The only remedy was to bring the RAV4’s entry speed down below 39 mph.

Things were so terrible that testers reportedly double-checked to see if the vehicle’s electronic stability control (ESC) was even active. Realizing that it was, the outlet called the results “scandalously bad” and added that the car would probably perform worse loaded with passengers. COVID restrictions required the test to swap in sandbags to adhere to testing protocols, lowering its center of mass a bit.

But it wasn’t the only mainstream crossover that failed and that’s not terribly surprising if you’ve spent any time driving them hard. The Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC40 Recharge T4 being tested at the same time as the Toyota also failed — albeit less dramatically. Teknikens Värld suggested this was one of the pitfalls of the segment, though made it clear that there are a few crossovers capable of handling the moose test with enough grace to warrant a recommendation.

[Image: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • TimK TimK on Dec 06, 2020

    I wonder if a “normal” non-bling set of tires would help this test? Low-profile rubber bands on over-size wheels don’t work very well when the vehicle starts to roll into a sharp turn.

  • Lastwgn Lastwgn on Dec 07, 2020

    The recommendation regarding deer is to brake but maintain a straight line. Swerving to avoid is not recommended because you are just as likely to swerve into the path of the deer, hence brake and maintain a straight line. Furthermore, a sudden swerve will just as likely cause a loss of control without providing any increase in deer avoidance. Here in Minnesota where I live, deer are not known to stand on an open road. When they enter the road they move quite quickly. As others have noted, often times by the time you see the deer it is too late anyway. Also note that deer are extremely gifted leapers. I once had a deer appear out of nowhere from the passenger side of the car. It leapt across the road, taking it over the hood of our SUV (a Mazda Tribute) and clipping the upper A pillar on the driver's side with its rear hoof. A moose will not leap the way a deer can leap.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Hard pass.
  • Lou_BC By the author's own admission, "It’s a bit of a shame that I didn’t have a chance to take the 2023 Ford F-150 Raptor R I tested off road", why post photos of it offroad?
  • SilverCoupe My wife had wanted one of these, but I influenced her to get a "big" car instead, a Mini Cooper S. I found the Abarth too rough riding, though the one we test drove had had its suspension modified by its owner.
  • SPPPP I am not thrilled for the inevitable false positives. Though that's certainly better than false negatives in the abstract - but people are supposed to be paying attention anyway. Seems like one more step toward a robotic, commoditized future. Bleh.
  • SPPPP I like it, though price seems a bit high, especially for an automatic. But it's in CA, so it's probably par for the course.
Next