New Details Emerge for Rivian R1T, R1S Configurations

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Details of the upcoming Rivian R1T and R1S electric vehicles leaked just hours ahead of the company sharing some equipment options for the various trims and announcing that the online configurations (allowing you to build your own) will launch on November 16th.

As of now, Rivian’s plan involves offering identical trims for the R1T pickup and R1S SUV — splitting the two body styles into Adventure and Explorer packages. While the former is a bit more upscale, both come with a panoramic roof, vegan upholstery, and are big on connectivity. Wi-Fi is embedded and allows for Rivian to issue over-the-air updates. There’s also the First Edition model, which is effectively a gussied up version of the Adventure going to true believers that booked their EVs well in advance.

The Adventure package adds creature comforts like heated/cooled seats, nicer materials inside the cabin, “Rivian Elevation 360” stereo system (with a removable Bluetooth speaker), and remote monitoring (to check the car’s vitals or make sure it’s not been stolen). Owners will also receive an onboard air compressor, tow hooks, and enhanced under-body protection for when you decided to try your hand at rock crawling. Those selecting the R1T pickup also get a power tonneau cover.

Explorer models fail to embrace the Adventure’s natural-grained ash wood interior finishes, adjustable front seats, Chilewich floor mats, or yellow accenting. The heated seats are still there, but they aren’t ventilated. The surround-sound audio system is there too, but you don’t get the removable speakers. There’s even a complementary tonneau cover for the pickup version, but you have to affix or remove it by hand.

This makes the Explorer quite a bit cheaper than the Adventure trim, however. The Rivian Owners Forum lists the R1T Adventure at $75,000 while the R1S comes in at $77,500. Explorer trims for the pickup and SUV are $67,500 and $70,000, respectively. Those numbers were later confirmed by the manufacturer, as was the “300+ mile” battery pack that comes standard in all Rivian products. The company also plans on issuing long-range variants (offering an estimated 400 miles of range) and cheaper, short-ranged versions in 2022.

If you can’t wait that long, First Edition models are supposed to start landing in people’s driveways in August 2021. Everything else isn’t supposed to arrive until January of 2022 at the earliest. The business also wants to launch a “Rivian Adventure Network” in the United States with fast-charging stations capable of recouping 140 miles in just 20 minutes.

Unfortunately, there’s no timeline for that program, and it’s another example of an EV manufacturer trying to have its own proprietary charging network — which is likely to incorporate fees masquerading as limited offers where you get “free” electricity for a few months. We’re also slightly concerned about where and how vehicles will be serviced since Rivian isn’t doing the dealership thing.

More details are supposed to be made available as we inch closer to launch. But we’re assuming the vehicles will launch with the 135-kWh pack. Rivian has also assured us that production models are still on track for 0-60 mph in 3 seconds and the ability to tow up to 11,000 pounds with the R1T (7,000 pounds on the R1S). Vehicles are also slated to receive advanced driving aids as standard that the company claims borders on autonomous driving. Considering how driving assistance and connectivity features rarely offer as much utility as manufacturers claim, we’re reserving judgment until we’ve actually gotten some seat time.

[Image: Rivian]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Nov 13, 2020

    The pass through storage between the cab and bed looks like it eats into the bed length, at least on the bottom half. The vegan upholstery would have to be at least as good as good leather to consider it. Otherwise it sounds like a nice vehicle.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Nov 13, 2020

    I can only think of the Mario Brothers and a Ba-Bomb whenever I see these. As far as different from the rest, it's not bad.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next