Toyota Was Way Off-target With Its Sales Forecast for the Fifth-generation Lexus LS

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Over the course of three decades, Lexus has accomplished remarkable feats in the U.S. marketplace. While the modern luxury landscape proves how challenging it is for a (non-Tesla) upstart such as Genesis to garner even an ounce of market share, Toyota’s premium brand generated relatively high volume levels from the get-go.

By 1991, only the third year on the market, Lexus had already overtaken all other import premium brands. By 1998, Lexus was able to top monthly luxury sales leaderboards. Then in 2000, Lexus became America’s top-selling premium marque. The Lexus LS, the brand’s flagship sedan, was an especially important piece of the puzzle in those early days. In fact, when Lexus first outsold Mercedes-Benz and BMW on an annual basis, the LS was one of just three Lexus nameplates. Nearly 43,000 copies of the LS were sold in 1990, for example, at a time when BMW’s 7 Series did just a quarter of that volume; and with Mercedes-Benz some 17,000 units abaft.

But as the LS gained license to move upmarket, as the Great Recession came and went, as the tastes of luxury car buyers became the tastes of luxury SUV buyers, the LS became something of a forgotten flagship. By the end of the fourth-generation LS’s tenure, Lexus was selling barely more than 300 LSs per month in America.

Yet with the launch of a new model in 2018, Lexus intended to dramatically increase the U.S. sales volume for its biggest and most costly sedan. And if at first it looked as though Lexus might just have forecasted accurately, a second glance reveals just how far off the mark even Lexus can be.

It’s not as though we haven’t seen this before with Lexus and its high-end products. Expectations for the LC coupe were chart-toppingly lofty. In 2017, Lexus anticipated monthly sales of 400 units for the LC500 and LC500h duo. Lexus initially hit that target, to be fair, but eventually fell far short. By 2019, Lexus was selling only around 100 LCs per month in the U.S.

In the case of the more mainstream LS, Lexus wanted to take the big four-door from the basement – 4,094 sales in 2017, an all-time low – to 12,000 sales per year with the launch of a new model. Lexus hadn’t topped the 12K mark since 2010 and hadn’t hit five-digit territory since 2013 for that matter. But it was hardly a fantasy. As recently as 2007, Lexus LS sales had risen to the third-highest annual total in the nameplate’s history: 35,226 units, a 16-year high. That was an 80-percent year-over-year increase thanks to the arrival of a new generation. Lexus had seen that sort of increase from a new LS before: in 2001, LS sales basically doubled, year-over-year, to 31,110 units.

2018’s car market, however, was hardly the car market of 2007 or 2001 or 1990.

Oh, at first the new fifth-generation LS moved along quite smartly. 1,008 LS sedans were sold in March 2018; another 999 the following month; another 908 in June of the same year. Then, a weakening of demand became apparent. The 900-unit marker was topped only twice more. In the second-half of the year, Lexus fell 18-percent shy of its monthly target.

And in 2019, the target resembled a moon shot. Year-over-year, U.S. Lexus LS volume decreased in each of the final 11 months of the year. Annual volume, in just the fifth-gen LS’s second model year, plunged 41 percent. Rather than attracting 1,000 buyers per month, the LS attracted 461 on average.

Granted, the market was hardly kind to the LS’s competitors. Mercedes-Benz S-Class sales fell 16 percent to a seven-year low of 12,528 units. BMW 7-Series volume, at 8,823 units, was 15-percent off its 10-year average. Audi only sold 2,963 A8s; half the number of A8s moved just half a decade earlier.

The LS is more overtly stylish than ever before. The LS’s longer/lower/wider look draws an even deeper divide between Lexus’s flagship car and the brand’s big SUVs. The LS still plays a strong value card in a segment controlled by the pricy S-Class.

None of this matters, because Lexus simply misread the mood. It wasn’t the first time, and likely won’t be the last. But it might not be a matter of great significance for a brand that now produces almost three-quarters of its U.S. volume from utility vehicles such as the NX.

Remember the NX? Lexus thought they’d sell around 2,200 per month. Instead, that’s how many NXs Lexus sells every two weeks.

[Images: Lexus]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Mar 17, 2020

    The problem is that it suffers from "Modern Lexus" flu. That is a hideous look that tries too hard and shows bad taste in as many ways as the dollars it charges.

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Mar 18, 2020

    I liked every LS generation (weak styling on the 01-03, before they sharpened it in 04), but don't like the current model's styling at all. I'd never buy one, because the exterior is ugly and incongruent, and the interior is overworked. They shot themselves in the foot trying to go for a "bold statement" or what have you, and also in the elimination of the V8.

  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next