Rare Rides: The 1996 Vector M12, an Elusive Supercar (Part II)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today is the second portion of the Vector story, which we began in our most recent Rare Rides post. Troubled from the start, the company underwent a hostile takeover by a firm called MegaTech, and fired its founder almost immediately.

The first MegaTech-developed product is our subject vehicle ⁠— the long and low M12. With an NAIAS debut in 1996, it seemed like Vector had a promising immediate future. Or did it?

After contribution from engineers at Vector and MegaTech’s other brand, Lamborghini, the new M12 ditched American power in favor of the 5.7-liter V12 from the Diablo. Said engine was mounted in front of the manual transmission, which was the opposite of the Diablo. Horsepower rang in at 492, with 425 lb-ft of torque. Sixty miles an hour arrived in 4.8 seconds and the M12 went on to a top speed of 189 mph.

A visual redesign was required before the M12 could go on sale. The new MegaTech Vector could not use the existing WX-3 design as it belonged to Gerald Wiegert. MegaTech called Peter Stevens, the man behind the McLaren F1, the redesign of the Lotus Esprit, and the Jaguar XJR-15.

Design finally ready, the M12 started production in 1995. It went on sale with an asking price of $189,000; considerably cheaper than its grandfather, the W3. But production didn’t last long. Sales didn’t come in as expected, and the company ran out of money during Indonesia’s financial crisis. MegaTech went looking for funds and found them in Germany: Audi was interested in Lamborghini, and ultimately purchased its assets in 1998. Vector also switched hands, returning to internal management as MegaTech left the picture, its owner in legal trouble.

Newly independent, Vector built the M12 once more. By 1999, a total of 14 M12s existed. Other M12s sat without their Lamborghini engines, as Vector never paid for them. Some engines were located eventually, and by the end of 1999 the M12 wrapped up its production. 17 total examples sped away the Floridian factory.

Vector planned to start production once more by cutting costs. The expensive Lamborghini power plant was ditched in favor of a GM LT1. Voila, the SRV8. But just days after the prototype’s debut, Vector closed down. Time for an ownership change: Vector Aeromotive’s assets were sold to a new company called American Aeromotive. All was returned to whence it originated: Gerald Wiegert was once again at the helm. He changed the company’s name to Avtech Motors, and then to Vector Supercars, then to Vector Motors.

The thrice-born company’s first product was the WX-8, which wore Supra headlamps and some very prototype looking bodywork. It debuted in 2006, 2007, and most recently at the 2008 LA Auto Show. Powered by a supercharged 10-liter V8 with an output of over 2,000 horsepower, top speed was claimed at 275 miles per hour. Though never built, it still exists as a real thing on the company’s website.

Today’s Rare Ride subject is a 1996 version of the M12 wearing utterly terrible OZ Racing wheels. With 6,000 miles on the odometer, it goes on sale in Monterey on Friday, August 16th. Price is estimated at $250,000 or more, which will be the most anyone ever paid for a car wearing Cavalier tail lamps.

[Images: RM Sotheby’s]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 13, 2019

    I didn't think I wanted it, but I see that it has a single DIN stereo with no interfaces to the car controls... No, still not interested.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Aug 14, 2019

    Being an excitable youth in the 80s I had a poster of this car, an AMG 560,and the original 911 turbo. Not mentioning Vector's cameo in Rising Sun is a journalistic misstep

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next