Late Delivery? Tesla Says It'll Cover Your Tax Credit Shortfall

by Steph Willems

Published: December 26th, 2018

late delivery tesla says it ll cover your tax credit shortfall

Having rung the bell on 200,000 electric vehicle deliveries in the U.S., Tesla will enter 2019 without the ability to offer a full $7,500 federal tax credit to would-be buyers. While not nearly as attractive an incentive as the same amount applied to a lower-priced EV, it’s still free public dollars. And it’s better than $3,750.

Twice this past fall, Tesla CEO Elon Musk warned customers they’d need to order by a certain date in order to ensure a delivery date prior to January 1st. After receiving a holiday earful from dutiful customers now facing late deliveries, Musk put on the Santa suit.

“If Tesla committed delivery & customer made good faith efforts to receive before year end, Tesla will cover the tax credit difference,” the CEO tweeted on Saturday.

Under the rules laid out by the Obama administration (and kept in place by the Trump administration), the tax credit amount drops by half after automakers deliver 200,000 eligible vehicles in the United States. The halving comes one full quarter after the quarter in which the OEM hits the mark. For Tesla, that mark came in the third quarter of 2018, making the first quarter of 2019 the point at which the credit shaves half its bills. It halves again starting in July 2019, then disappears six months later.

While Tesla guaranteed timely delivery of vehicles purchased up to November 30th, it seems several slipped through the cracks. Musk later pinned the company’s promise to the top of his Twitter page. In response to a customer, the CEO added that deliveries of all Mid-Range Model 3 sedans (currently, the cheapest Tesla you can actually get your hands on) are expected before January 1st.

Once the credit halves and Musk’s IOUs run out, holdouts for the long-awaited base Model 3 will find themselves with less of an incentive than they may have initially anticipated. Musk claims production of the $35,000 car will begin in the first quarter of 2019. In October, he mentioned that offering a Model 3 at that price too soon would essentially sink the company.

[Image: Tesla]

#EVTaxCredit #Tesla #TeslaModel3

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 17 comments

Brandloyalty on Dec 26, 2018

No new prediction of when Tesla will go bankrupt?

Like Reply
Qwerty shrdlu on Dec 27, 2018

There is only one prediction : "real soon now." And if it happens before the heat death of the universe, the anti-fanboys will claim this proves that they knew what they were talking about.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.