Musk's Tesla U-turn Prompted by Annoyed Saudis and Fearful Fans, Despite Interest From Volkswagen: Reports

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Friday night’s not-so-surprising move by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in which he wheeled around his plan to take the company private like an angry father cutting short a family vacation, has many angles.

First and foremost is the money factor, which matters more than anything else in this drama. According to two new reports, money eventually became available, just not from the sources we were led to expect. And not from sources Musk wanted.

According to the Wall Street Journal, green-seeking auto giant Volkswagen wanted a piece of Tesla’s action. After Musk’s team of assembled bankers rushed to put together a roster of investors last week, Volkswagen stood out among the final group. This group, it should be noted, was apparently willing to put up $30 billion in funding for the buyout.

Sources with knowledge of the dealings claim this motley crew of big players was not what Musk had hoped for. He was warned that they, and most certainly VW, would want a big say in how the automaker conducted itself. Meanwhile, many of Musk’s beloved mutual funds and small, superfan investors threatened to pull out, or at least pare their holdings.

As we all know, Musk likes having his own hand on the tiller.

While all of this was going on, Saudi Arabia was growing perturbed. The country’s sovereign wealth fund, tapped as a source of funding for Musk’s plan, is not an ATM from which anyone can just withdraw cash. According to Bloomberg, the Saudis weren’t too pleased that Musk mentioned their meetings in a public blog post.

Nor were the Saudis interested in holding a large stake in the company, sources claim, with concerns about the SEC’s investigation into Musk’s Aug. 7th tweets creating concern among the fund’s overseers. There was never a deal reached on just how much the sovereign wealth fund would contribute, the sources state.

Funding secured? Not by a long shot.

Tesla’s share price fell nearly four percent after trading opened Monday morning, but the stock has since recovered half of the loss.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Aug 27, 2018

    I wonder how much of Tesla that VW was expecting to buy with $30B - perhaps hoping for a firesale price on an unprofitable company? Not sure why VW would want Tesla anyway. Audi and Porsche are equally prestigious brands, and VW certainly has better engineering and manufacturing capability and facilities. Perhaps they want inside knowledge about how to build cars in tents?

    • See 3 previous
    • Malforus Malforus on Aug 28, 2018

      It was a total greenwash acquisition to wash the Diesel scandal from the newspapers. Obviously they wanted TESLA so they could wipe away the smog of bad press. Unfortunately it would have been hamfisted at best and I am certain the TELSA Board was unwilling to take a valuation haircut in today's climate.

  • FWD Donuts FWD Donuts on Aug 27, 2018

    Interesting photo with this article. You might think that's a baby behind the wheel. Nope. That's a 35 year old Google engineer. Somehow, the camera settings revealed the age of his mental capacity. Guess I need to look at the settings of my iPhone a little more closely.

  • Jeff One less option will be available for an affordable midsize sedan. Not much can be done about GM discontinuing the Malibu. GM, Ford, and Stellantis have been discontinuing cars for the most part to focus on pickups, crossovers, and suvs. Many buyers that don't want trucks or truck like vehicles have moved onto Japanese and South Korean brands. Meanwhile large pickups and suvs continue to pile up on dealer lots with some dealers still adding market adjustments to the stickers. Even Toyota dealers have growing inventories of Tundras and Tacomas.
  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
  • Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
  • AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
Next