Returning Chevrolet Sonic Ditches an Unloved Engine

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Chevrolet’s little Sonic hatchback and sedan, built alongside the electric Bolt at General Motors’ Orion Assembly Plant, will return for the 2019 model year with a notable powertrain change. We already knew a 2019 version of the Sonic — rumored to be on the chopping block — was a go (thanks to California Air Resources Board certification docs), but the contents of an order guide now show greater standard torque than the 2018 model.

Notice we said torque, not horsepower.

That’s because for 2019, the Sonic ditches its never-talked-about base 1.8-liter four-cylinder in favor of a turbocharged unit. An order guide seen by GMAuthority shows the entry-level engine, once offered in the first-generation Cruze, disappears, and along with it its 138 horsepower and 125 lb-ft of torque.

In its place is the engine available as an upgrade since the Sonic’s 2012 debut: a turbocharged 1.4-liter inline-four generating 138 hp but a much healthier 148 lb-ft of torque. This engine also sets up shop in the Trax crossover, though it disappeared from the Cruze for that model’s second generation. A choice of six-speed manual or automatic remain round out the returning transmission choices.

Other changes to the 2019 Sonic are minor. Two paint colors bit the dust — Ivy Metallic and Arctic Blue Metallic — but in their place a new color (“Shock”) enters the palette. Don’t expect a subdued hue. Buyers will no longer have a Fun and Sun Package on their options list, so say goodbye to that turbo/sunroof/painted wheel combo.

In even more minor news, the Sonic LT sedan, when equipped with automatic transmission, loses its standard remote start. Buyers can add that feature back via the LT trim’s Convenience Package.

Greater standard twist is a good thing, but it’s debatable whether the 2019 upgrades will persuade many buyers to take a second look at Sonic. The model’s sales have slipped continuously for years. Sonic’s 2017’s tally was less than one-third of 2014’s volume, and this year hasn’t brought any improvements. Year-to-date, Sonic sales fell 41.2 percent compared to the same period last year.

While the Sonic stages a return for 2019, it’s hard to see the model surviving much longer without a rebound in sales.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 46 comments
  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 08, 2018

    Is there a "hot" version of this? I would love to see Z24 badges in this and some sort of "ST" version.

    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 08, 2018

      BTW, I am in the middle of a move where I have already relocated and drive home on the weekends. I left the F150 parked and drove the Fiesta ST back because gas is a thing. Turns out she had a ton of stuff for me to take back that I figured there was no way would fit. It fit and I can still see out the back window. I get hatchbacks now lol.

  • Blackcloud_9 Blackcloud_9 on Jul 09, 2018

    Interestingly, out here in SoCal I see a lot more Sparks than Sonics out in the wild. I had a Sonic as a loaner while my Spark EV (See?) was in for warranty work. It had the 1.8/Auto and it was a perfectly serviceable car. It did not inspire any desire. I also test-drove a Sonic while car shopping (Eventually ended up with a Soul). It had the 1.4T/Auto setup. I found the engine and tranny ill-suited to each other. The engine wanted to rev to enjoy the turbo spool-up but the trans wanted to keep up-shifting for fuel economy.

    • Festiboi Festiboi on Jul 09, 2018

      As a whole across the country, I tend to see more Sparks than Sonics. Which is bizarre, given America's preference towards larger cars. Even more ironically, Australia, which has higher fuel prices and is more favourable to smaller cars, has had its smaller Holden Spark discontinued due to poor sales while the larger Holden Barina (Chevy Sonic) continues on with solid sales

  • Theflyersfan I always thought this gen XC90 could be compared to Mercedes' first-gen M-class. Everyone in every suburban family in every moderate-upper-class neighborhood got one and they were both a dumpster fire of quality. It's looking like Volvo finally worked out the quality issues, but that was a bad launch. And now I shall sound like every car site commenter over the last 25 years and say that Volvo all but killed their excellent line of wagons and replaced them with unreliable, overweight wagons on stilts just so some "I'll be famous on TikTok someday" mom won't be seen in a wagon or minivan dropping the rug rats off at school.
  • Theflyersfan For the stop-and-go slog when sitting on something like The 405 or The Capital Beltway, sure. It's slow and there's time to react if something goes wrong. 85 mph in Texas with lane restriping and construction coming up? Not a chance. Radar cruise control is already glitchy enough with uneven distances, lane keeping assist is so hyperactive that it's turned off, and auto-braking's sole purpose is to launch loose objects in the car forward. Put them together and what could go wrong???
  • Jalop1991 This is easy. The CX-5 is gawdawful uncomfortable.
  • Aaron This is literally my junkyard for my 2001 Chevy Tracker, 1998 Volvo S70, and 2002 Toyota Camry. Glad you could visit!
  • Lou_BC Let me see. Humans are fallible. They can be very greedy. Politicians sell to the highest bidder. What could go wrong?
Next