Mr. Musk Goes to China, Vehicles to Pour Forth

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla’s sole assembly plant in Fremont, California won’t be lonely for long. A preliminary deal reached between the automaker and the government of Shanghai could see a new assembly plant start production in about three years’ time. The Chinese plant would most likely build Model 3s and upcoming Model Y crossovers, Bloomberg reports.

Assuming Tesla can scrounge up the $4 to $5 billion needed to complete construction of the facility (a Goldman Sachs estimate), the plant could produce up to 500,000 vehicles per year. And it just so happens that Shanghai has a free trade zone.

This morning’s news was foreshadowed when a new Tesla subsidiary popped up in that city in May. Musk travelled to China on Tuesday, stopping near a cave in another country on the way.

Shanghai is an increasingly attractive target for foreign automakers, especially since the Trump administration launched a series of trade tariffs at China. The People’s Republic, which already levied import duties on foreign-made cars, but had promised to lower them, hiked its tariffs back up in retaliation. China’s tariff on U.S. vehicles now stands at 40 percent.

By manufacturing in-country with the help of local suppliers, Tesla can side-step the duties that forced it to raise sticker prices by up to 75 percent compared to the U.S. market. Relatively low-priced vehicle like the Model 3 and Model Y (a vehicle whose price point is unknown, but surely lower than the Model X SUV) are a shoo-in for the China factory. Fremont can handle the Model S and X duties.

While Tesla expects to be cash-positive by the end of the year, the assembly plant’s price tag worries some investors. It’s possible Shanghai might help in that regard.

“The Shanghai municipal government will fully support the construction of the Tesla factory,” said the Shanghai Municipal People’s Government in a statement printed by Reuters.

In the past, Tesla argued against China’s policy of requiring foreign automakers to partner 50-50 with a local manufacturer, but the country has since announced an end to that practice. The mandate should run its course by 2022 — roughly the same time as the plant’s opening. With the threat of technology theft lessened, Tesla claims it plans to invest in R&D at its Shanghai facility.

[Image: Maurizio Pesce/ Flickr ( CC BY 2.0)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Cicero1 Cicero1 on Jul 10, 2018

    Three years, so in Tesla time around 2075.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 10, 2018

    I ask seriously...no snark intended, but is Tesla being cash positive by the end of the year a real possibility or Musk being Musk here? Also, if so has there been any word on an updated model S? The design has changed little since 2011. If the company is turning a corner and looks viable I'd add the S to my list of vehicles I'll look at in a couple years, however I've heard of nothing new in the pipeline and it will be 9 years old with only a minor refresh at that point. I'd like to see it get an interior more fitting of something in that range.

    • Mike978 Mike978 on Jul 10, 2018

      I would expect in typical Tesla fashion that it will be about $100 cash positive after pulling out all the stops like charging $2500 for orders that get built in January 2019 etc.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next