Ford Has No Plans For China's Taurus To Become America's Taurus

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The Ford Taurus’s North American demise is not unanticipated. Full-size car sales are flagging. The Taurus nameplate’s positive brand recognition is based on the success it enjoyed in another era. And Ford already revealed a new China-specific Taurus, based on the same CD4 platform as the Fusion and Lincoln Continental, with no announcement regarding the import of that vehicle to North America.

It also seems Ford, riding high on a wave of crossover and SUV sales on this side of the Pacific, won’t be bringing that Taurus to America anytime soon.

While speaking with Global Product Communications Craig von Essen on another matter, TTAC learned Ford’s plan for the Taurus is very much focused on China.

“The Taurus built and sold in China was introduced as an all-new flagship sedan for China, designed specifically to meet the needs of the Chinese consumers. At the moment, there are no plans to offer this vehicle elsewhere,” von Essen says.

As for the Taurus that continues to wither on the vine in North America, sales are down 6 percent through 2017’s first-quarter after falling 10 percent in calendar year 2016, 22 percent in 2015, and 22 percent in 2014. Ford is on track to sell approximately half as many Taurus sedans in the U.S. in 2017 as Ford sold just four years ago.

That includes the Taurus Police Interceptor Sedan, sales of which are sliding even faster in early 2017. Through the first three months of this year, Taurus Police Interceptor sales are down 19 percent, year-over-year, after declining in each of the last three calendar years. This year, 14 percent of the Tauruses sold are built as Police Interceptors.

Meanwhile, the Explorer Police Interceptor is attracting more than four times as many buyers as its Taurus counterpart. Ford has also unveiled a Fusion Hybrid-based police car that is now “ pursuit-rated.”

If the Police Interceptor isn’t a reason to save the Taurus, what about the strength of America’s full-size sedan market?

Uh, what strength?

The fleet-reliant large sedan segment has already lost more than 23,000 sales in the first three months of 2017, an 18-percent drop compared with the same period in 2016. Whether it’s the new Buick LaCrosse, the top-selling Dodge Charger, or the Taurus itself, big sedans at volume brands are tanking. Full-size volume brand sedans now form only 7 percent of America’s passenger car market.

Ford Motor Company builds both the Taurus and Explorer at its Chicago, Illinois, assembly plant. The Taurus’s Lincoln partner, the MKS, saw its production come to an end last year as Lincoln replaced the MKS with a Continental. The Continental is built alongside the Mustang in Flat Rock, Michigan.

The Taurus’s home market future isn’t the only Ford passenger car about which we have doubts. Two months ago, we questioned why Ford wouldn’t commit to the new Fiesta in America after revealing the car for European consumption. At the time, a Ford spokesperson told TTAC, “We’ll have more to say about other markets at a later date.”

We have twice inquired since as to whether Ford is ready to announce whether the new Fiesta will actually make it to the United States. Ford has declined to comment.

The current Fiesta has been on sale in the U.S. since 2010. The current Taurus rides on Ford’s Volvo-derived D3 platform, continuing a D3 sedan tradition that dates to the Ford Five Hundred’s introduction in 2004.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @timcaingcbc.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Carguy622 Carguy622 on Apr 21, 2017

    I'm going to miss the nameplate more than the current car, which is just an average automobile. Growing up so many people I knew had Tauruses, especially the very sleek wagons. The Taurus name will always have a special place in my heart. The idiotic decision in the mid 2000s to name everything with an F, brought us the Fusion, which should have been names Taurus. Domestic manufacturers change nameplates too much!

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on May 25, 2017

    I have driven and rode in my close friend's 2014 Taurus Limited AWD numerous times. The best part of that car was the V6, 6 speed transmission and the large trunk. Back seat legroom was good but not as good as some other full size cars and even a few mid sizers. The 19" factory tires gave it a busy thumpy ride but handling was sound considering it weighed in at over 4300 LBS! Gas mileage as a result was usually hovering around 17-18 with any city driving involved and highway stints generally saw about 23-24. The car did need 3 out of 4 of it's wheel bearings replaced before 100K, the blendoor motor went south and then it developed two separate oil leaks in the oil pan and a oil return line tube that rusted out. It also strangely went through 3 sets of tires in but 3 years time despite religious tire rotation. If it were my money it would be a 2014-17 Epsilon Impala every time over this car.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next