Premium SUV Market Share Grows as Transaction Prices Head South

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

With consumers crawling all over crossovers and SUVs, you’d think that automakers would be eager to make some extra cash by generously hiking transaction prices.

Well, automakers might want it, but they certainly aren’t foolish enough to do it. Not in this stagnating marketplace, and not with the importance heaped on that wildly competitive segment. According to Kelley Blue Book, the average transaction price growth in all SUV and crossover segments remains at or below inflation.

However, when it compared transaction prices — minus incentives — in January of this year compared to the same month last year, the research company found that a certain hot-selling segment saw a consistent drop in window sticker value.

The industry as a whole saw transaction prices rise, on average, 3.3 percent year-over-year. Minivan prices, energized by the mid-year introduction of the Chrysler Pacifica, rose 4 percent. Entry-level luxury cars rose 4.8 percent. The rest? Not much to talk about.

Utility vehicles, on the other hand, didn’t come close to the average. Compact utilities saw transaction prices rise a modest 1.5 percent, which midsize models rose by 1.6 percent. Full-size utilities were subject to the largest price increase, though that figure was only 2 percent. On the bottom rung, subcompact crossovers and SUVs actually saw a price decrease compared to last January, dropping 0.6 percent.

On the luxury side, all segments dropped in average price. Compact luxury utility vehicles dropped an imperceptible 0.1 percent, while midsize models fell 0.9 percent. It’s at the top of the range where the difference was greatest — full-size luxury utilities saw average transaction prices that were 2.2 percent lower last month than in January 2016.

The pricing trend seems to jibe with the segment’s popularity.

According to TTAC sales guru Tim Cain, premium auto brand SUV and crossover sales jumped 13 percent to 1.1 million units in the U.S. in 2016. Contrast that with utility offerings from mainstream brands, which grew 7 percent last year. Premium brands – boosted by the introduction of Jaguar, Maserati, Bentley – own 16 percent of the U.S. utility vehicle market.

Automakers rake in big profits from luxury vehicles, especially those capable of hauling generous amounts of cargo. That leaves a cushion to beat off rivals with competitive pricing.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Feb 02, 2017

    I think competition is keeping a cap pricing. A larger selection of SUVs to choose from is great.

  • Whitworth Whitworth on Feb 02, 2017

    I have to think at some point this is a matter of hitting a price ceiling on what even well-heeled consumers are willing to pay for full size SUVs. They gone far past the rate of inflation, the average Escalade for example probably leaves the dealership at $90k. You;re talking a VERY small amount of people that can afford that type of car. A Tahoe or Suburban is like $70k-$80k plus these days. These used to be upper-middle class vehicles, not something that was associated with being very wealthy.

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next