QOTD: What Motorsport Rule Changes Completely Changed the Game?

by Matthew Guy

Published: February 13th, 2017

qotd what motorsport rule changes completely changed the game

There’s an old saying, coined by NASCAR legend Junior Johnson, that suggests the quickest way to make a small fortune in racing is to start with a big one. While my yard is notably devoid of multi-million dollar race haulers, I can certainly understand the seeds of truth in this cautionary tale: when the powers-that-be decide to change the rules in a particular series, it causes all hands to reach for their checkbooks.

There have been plenty of rule changes in motorsport over the years. Formula 1 changes its downforce packages more often than my wife’s teenage sister changes her Snapchat filters, for example. F1 is also known for decreeing the use of new engines, ranging over the years from turbo V6s to honkin’ V10s to small-displacement V12s, not to mention the bizarre powertrain configurations that appeared in the ’60s and ’70s. The amount of adaptation beggars belief.

Stock car racing isn’t immune to this trend, either.

For 2017, NASCAR has decided to split all its races into three segments. The phrase “heat race” appears nowhere in NASCAR-approved propaganda, but that’s exactly what they will be. NASCAR will award championship points to the top ten finishers in the first two heats with normal points being paid to all finishers at the checkered flag.

Naturally, this will completely change the structure of a race, and affect everything from pit decisions to fuel strategy. This doesn’t take into account other rule changes for the 2017 season, which determine tires used at the start of the race and restrictions around to what degree teams can repair damaged cars during a race. It’s going to be a huge adjustment for teams and fans alike.

What rule change do you think has had the most effect on a particular series in recent years? Was it when they started to allow hybrids at LeMans? How about when the FIA banned turbos in F1?

One thing’s for sure: big rule changes force teams to innovate at the highest level, making it great fun to watch.

#Nascar #QOTD #QuestionOfTheDay #Racing

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 12 comments

Markogts on Feb 13, 2017

F1 1993-94. Williams was winning everything thanks to electronic suspension. They even hired Senna for the next season. But nobody was watching F1 if Ferrari wasn't winning, so they forbade electronic suspension, and this in turn, albeit indirectly, killed Senna. I doubt one can conceive a greater and more unfair regulation change in motorsports.

Like Reply
Stingray65 on Feb 14, 2017

Junk formula for Indy 500 in 1930. Mandated a riding mechanic passenger, and displacement limit with from 1.5 liters to 6.0 liters.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.