Piston Slap: Best Reason to Buy a Chrysler 200?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Ronald writes:

I have an hour-plus commute with light to moderate traffic that fluctuates between 50 to 70 miles per hour. Adaptive cruse control would be great, but how cheap of a used car can I find with the technology?

Sajeev answers:

My value to the Internet goes beyond Google searches. Wikipedia lists numerous vehicles that have adaptive cruise control going back to 1999, but most of those older vehicles are flagships that are too old and cost-ineffective as reliable daily drivers. Of course, you can pull off flagship ownership if you’re forum junkie, are handy with tools, and you buy parts cheaply online.

But, at what price comes relaxed motoring and when is such motoring no longer stress-free? The needle (or needles) in the haystack is found further down the list.

  • 2008: Lincoln introduced radar adaptive cruise control on the 2009 Lincoln MKS.
  • 2009: ACC and CMBS also became available as optional features in the model year the 2010 Acura MDX, Mid Model Change (MMC) and the newly introduced 2010 Acura ZDX.
  • 2010: Jeep introduces Adaptive Cruise Control on the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
  • 2014: Chrysler introduces full-speed-range radar Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop+ on the 2015 Chrysler 200.

Hello there!

The 2009 Lincoln MKS has potential thanks to a shared platform with the Taurus/Five Hundred. The Acura ZDX is so silly but somewhat sensible under the skin. However, it’s the Chrysler that wins on price: the 200 is a toxic piece of automotive real estate. It’s the best value for long-term ownership: your next car is a Chrysler 200.

I’ve never driven a 200, but they look nice (except the DLO FAIL). Even Jack didn’t have much to discount. I bet you could get a new one for many hundreds (or thousands?) under invoice price, enjoy favorable new car finance rates, and avoid overpriced used vehicles. This combination means looking elsewhere for active cruise control is likely a fool’s errand.

[Image: Chrysler]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 76 comments
  • Danio3834 Danio3834 on Oct 13, 2016

    I love this feature to the point that fiddling with the buttons on a regular cruise system is annoying. I'll get a car with it wherever possible.

    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Oct 15, 2016

      Just like automatic climate-control for me; I'm constantly futzing with it otherwise!

  • Akear Akear on Nov 18, 2016

    From the front it is the best looking mid-sized car. The 200 handles better than the Camry. Lets be honest the Camry is just about the worse handling mid-sized car around. If you look at all the various automotive press tests the Camry is always trailing in the handling department. In some ways in the tradition of being America's top family sedan it celebrates its mediocre handling as a virtue.

  • Daniel J Cx-5 lol. It's why we have one. I love hybrids but the engine in the RAV4 is just loud and obnoxious when it fires up.
  • Oberkanone CX-5 diesel.
  • Oberkanone Autonomous cars are afraid of us.
  • Theflyersfan I always thought this gen XC90 could be compared to Mercedes' first-gen M-class. Everyone in every suburban family in every moderate-upper-class neighborhood got one and they were both a dumpster fire of quality. It's looking like Volvo finally worked out the quality issues, but that was a bad launch. And now I shall sound like every car site commenter over the last 25 years and say that Volvo all but killed their excellent line of wagons and replaced them with unreliable, overweight wagons on stilts just so some "I'll be famous on TikTok someday" mom won't be seen in a wagon or minivan dropping the rug rats off at school.
  • Theflyersfan For the stop-and-go slog when sitting on something like The 405 or The Capital Beltway, sure. It's slow and there's time to react if something goes wrong. 85 mph in Texas with lane restriping and construction coming up? Not a chance. Radar cruise control is already glitchy enough with uneven distances, lane keeping assist is so hyperactive that it's turned off, and auto-braking's sole purpose is to launch loose objects in the car forward. Put them together and what could go wrong???
Next