The 2016 Chevrolet Spark With Manual Locks Has One Power Lock For OnStar

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

We told you — yea, we even showed you — that the most basic 2016 Chevrolet Spark you can buy has manual locks, but also a power lock.

Fascinated? We were. After driving around in a car with manual locks that automatically locked its driver’s door at 8 miles per hour and unlocked its driver’s door when the key was removed from ignition, we were spooked and amazed and perplexed. We asked GM for comment but initially did not hear back.

Now we have.

The Spark LS’s manual locks are in fact manual locks, but only on the three passenger doors. The driver’s door of the base LS model features a power lock actuator that, according to GM Canada spokesperson George Saratlic, “is there to facilitate our OnStar Lock-Out Service.”

Essentially, it’s a safety issue then.

“This service can unlock the driver door remotely with satellite signal,” Saratlic told TTAC. “It is available to customers with active OnStar subscription, and also enables customers to unlock their car remotely from their smart phone with the MyChevrolet/RemoteLink app.”

In other words, the buyer of an ultra-basic Spark — there are no power windows or mirrors, either, and no air conditioning — receives one quasi-power lock in order to facilitate a subscriber safety service. There’s no key fob to unlock the driver’s door from a distance, no proximity access to negate the need of removing the key fob from your pocket, not even a button on the driver’s door to lock the Spark. If you want to lock the driver’s door, just like any of the other Spark’s doors, you must depress the actual lock or insert the key on the outside of the car, and twist.

In the 2016 Chevrolet Spark LS, there is one power lock that’s completely controlled by the Spark and its corporate overlords. It exists to enable two functions — emergency unlock service and remote unlock via your phone — that will only exist if the owner of a $13,875 2016 Chevrolet Spark LS pays an additional $19.99 per month for OnStar.

In Canada, the $11,595 2016 Chevrolet Spark LS requires at least $24.99/month for OnStar.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 31 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Aug 29, 2016

    ...In the 2016 Chevrolet Spark LS, there is one power lock that’s completely controlled by the Spark and its corporate overlords. It exists to enable two functions — emergency unlock service and remote unlock via your phone — that will only exist if the owner of a $13,875 2016 Chevrolet Spark LS pays an additional $19.99 per month for OnStar... There is a third function. GM can continue to claim the baseline of OnStar functionality on all GM vehicles sold in the US and Canada. If this wasn't there, a lot of product positioning, messaging, and marketing collateral would have to be changed. Class action law suits would follow, and lawyers would be paid $103,000,346.73 for bringing to light the false advertising, and the group of adversely impacted Spark LS owners would get a $100 credit toward the purchase of a new GM vehicle.

  • Eb113013 Eb113013 on Apr 05, 2019

    My wife has a 2016 Chevy Spark LS and YES IT DOES HAVE AIR CONDITIONING. Not sure why you would even say that. And all you have to do is buy a key fob off eBay, get the key cut to your VIN or with a picture of your current key, then program the key fob to your car and viola! You now have a working key fob that unlocks and locks your driver door.

  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
  • Jalop1991 I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Next