Piston Slap: MAP-ping Engine Load

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC regular David Holzman writes:

When my scan gauge says my engine is under 99% load, and I’ve only pushed the gas pedal about halfway down, does that mean, as I suspect, that I can floor it and I’m not going to get more than a drop more power out of it?

And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?

Sajeev answers:

I’ve wondered this myself, just not enough to research until someone posed the question to TTAC.

Since the dawn of carburetors, vehicles used engine vacuum to measure engine load under the guise of a fuel economy gauge. Earlier EFI machines implemented fuel injector duty cycle to spit out a fuel economy reading. It’s cheaper/easier/simpler to use the fuel injection computer’s powers to calculate an approximate number, but many (all?) newer models use the mass-airflow sensor (MAF) and/or the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor as the basis of these calculations.

As per SAE standard J1979, there are two engine load values: calculated and absolute load value. I suspect absolute load value is used in more customer facing interfaces, as it’s a normalized figure that might be easier to apply across multiple engines, platforms and operation parameters sans re-work. And it probably neuters the data as to not cause end user confusion, warranty claims, lawsuits, etc.

If reading this hamfisted analysis upsets you, methinks you’re a pretty frickin’ brilliant engineer. Distilling this into an easy to digest blog post isn’t easy, as I was more of a Collegiate SAE wonk. But let’s get it down to one sentence:

Load values are a normalized calculation of engine airflow, which isn’t a 100% accurate measure of the load on your vehicle’s engine at any time.

How’s that for not answering your question and giving me a headache? I console myself with this Hot Panther Looove:

Oooooh yeah, muuuuuuch better.

[Image: Shutterstock user Joyseulay]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.


Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 34 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Aug 18, 2014

    It's trying to tell you to downshift/floor it, if you want faster acceleration.

  • Cdotson Cdotson on Aug 18, 2014

    "And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?" Strictly addressing this statement there are a couple misconceptions evident. Modern cars cannot prevent you from pushing the accelerator pedal further than where you hit full engine load. Pushing the pedal further down actually won't consume any more fuel anyway. Also in computer-controlled/EFI automobiles the "wasting gas" part starts happening once you surpass 80-85% load as that is typically the threshold at which the ECU starts referencing safe/rich fuel maps and ignoring the O2 sensors. Your ScanGauge should have a setting that will display to you whether you are in open/closed-loop operation. If you monitor that particular gauge you can train yourself to drive within closed-loop control to maximize fuel economy if you so desire. You will notice that at low engine speeds and in higher gears it will switch to open-loop operation with smaller throttle inputs than at higher speeds or in lower gears. Given that vehicles now are all either MPFI or DI there is every incentive to massively oversize the throttle body. Larger throttles produce less flow restriction and the need for turbulent flow at the butterfly valve for fuel atomization no longer exists. Larger throttles "leak" a little more and prevent some emissions problems that arrive at high engine speeds when you side-step the throttle.

    • See 6 previous
    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Aug 19, 2014

      @cdotson Emission controlled engines never run at stoichiometric except by chance when in open loop mode. To control the fuel the computer continuously adjusts the mixture until it gets rich or lean, once it sees that it is running lean it starts adjusting the other way until it sees a rich single then goes back to looking for it to be lean. Not only does this allow the computer to find the right fueling it is done to keep the catalytic converter working properly. The modern catalytic converter has an oxidation and reduction section. The oxidation section needs a lean mixture to provide the extra O2 for oxidation to occur. The reduction portion needs some unburnt fuel to keep the reaction hot and going. Cars with wide band O2 sensors still do this because the cat needs it.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next