By on June 20, 2014

450x300xIMG_8619-450x300.jpg.pagespeed.ic.j3DujeKkZR

 

After nearly a decade of production, Jaguar will finally put down the XK, as budgetary resources and the introduction of the F-Type Coupe make the big cat redundant.

Although sales of the XK are up slightly, the big coupe and convertible have been on a general downward trend over the years. According to Automotive News, Jaguar wants to focus their resources on the new XE compact luxury sedan, as well as other projects – most likely the long rumored crossover.

Jaguar was adamant that the F-Type is not replacing the XK, which leaves room for a possible replacement down the road. The XK is a larger, more comfortable grand tourer, while the F-Type is positioned as a sports car. But don’t expect to see a new XK for a long time.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

26 Comments on “TTAC Salutes: The Jaguar XK...”


  • avatar
    Charles T

    Pity, and right when they finally fixed the startled catfish front end. IIRC the F-type hasn’t been selling very well either so hopefully they don’t regret this decision.

  • avatar
    ZCD2.7T

    My sister owns a 2012 XK8 coupe. It’s gorgeous inside and out, and sounds amazing – very seductive.

    That said, the F-type is at least as gorgeous, much less expensive and performs better even with the V-6, so it does appear to have made the XK redundant.

    More’s the pity – can never have too many beautiful cars on the road…

  • avatar
    Kendahl

    Seven years ago, when I was shopping for my retirement toy, an XK coupe would have been a strong candidate but for one issue — no manual transmission even on the XKR.

    • 0 avatar
      salhany

      It’s a grand tourer. Isn’t a manual transmission antithetical to the mission of a grand tourer?

      • 0 avatar
        28-Cars-Later

        XJS was a grand tourer, this and XK8 were closer to pony car dimensions.

        • 0 avatar
          juicy sushi

          A pony car was a GT. A cheap one, but 4 passengers, a big motor, two doors and a trunk fits the definition to a ‘t’.

          I never could get on with the original Ford Taurus headlights. It got better, but the F-Type just does the whole concept so much better, it just makes sense to phase it out.

  • avatar
    thats one fast cat

    I never really cottoned to the new ones and agree with the wide mouthed fish view of them.

    The look of the 97-2004 coupes I always thought were absolutely gorgeous – so much so that I bought 98 in Atlantic blue.

    It will be a shame to see them go, but maybe it will help the Ftype survive.

  • avatar
    koshchei

    After the Ford sale, Jaguars stopped looking “Jaguar” to me. For me, there are several quintessential models: the XK120, the 1971 XKE, and the XJ series 3.

    I realize that they were terrible terrible vehicles, but nothing they do now has anywhere close to the gravitas that these earlier models exude.

  • avatar
    Featherston

    @ thats one fast cat – I just saw a late ’90s XK parked on the street earlier this week and was thinking what an attractive car it is. It’s kind of “E-type meets first-gen Lexus SC.” I prefer its looks, and those of the SC, to anything on the market today. Sadly, the last umpteen SC’s I’ve seen have been rife with dents, scratched paint, aftermarket wheels, spoilers, and gold emblems.

  • avatar
    ccd1

    Now that my wife has gotten her new car, the XK is one of several cars that has caught my attention. The depreciation on these cars is epic and your $100K XKR can be had for around $50K around 4 years later with reasonable miles.

    But beyond the very pretty face, there are things that just give me pause. This is a relatively big, heavy (4,000 lbs) car and it feels like a big car. The infotainment is the worst I’ve ever seen and looking at it leads me to believe you could not easily replace it with an aftermarket unit. The gas mileage might be good for a supercharged V-8, but it is still terrible (22 on the highway). The rear seats are useless but they do not fold down even though the car it a hatch!

    Beautiful car but definitely showing its age and ready for retirement

    • 0 avatar
      CoreyDL

      I agree on the age and due retirement. But Jag has always run their models for a long time. The XK in particular was designed at the deepest, lowest point of Jaguar financial issues – and it shows today.

  • avatar

    I feel the F-Type and XK satisfy two different niches.

    The XK is more of a grand tourer in the vein of the XJS–it’s a poor man’s Aston Martin made for transporting two people in style and comfort.

    The F-type is more feral and competes directly with the Boxter and Cayman.

    As much as I like the F-type, I’d love to see Jaguar do a modern XJS grand tourer again.

    • 0 avatar
      ellomdian

      Most people who think the F-Type fills the XK’s role haven’t sat in either – and they tend to call my 6 a ‘sports car’ as well.

      Sad to see another big GT pass on, but the XK has always been awkward – if beautiful – company next to the 6 and SL. I’m disappointed to hear there are no plans for immediate replacement, but GT’s are more and more niche vehicles. Too bad, but it means the final year will likely be something special on the off-lease market.

  • avatar
    Mandalorian

    Too bad. I suppose it was starting to get a little long in the tooth.

    The big cat’s 9 lives are up.

  • avatar
    Davekaybsc

    I imagine it would just be too difficult to come up with something that can properly challenge the new SL, which doesn’t bother with stupid, useless rear seats and doesn’t ask you to make the choice between coupe and convertible. The XK has always been better looking, but the SL has always been the better car.

  • avatar
    tjh8402

    I never could warm up to the look of these, despite the love and adulation they received in the media. They had the misfortune of replacing a car that, as others above have said, will likely be remembered as an absolutely timeless classic and beauty. That being said, the (I hope completely accidental) family resemblance to the Ford Taurus did not help the car’s case. Ian Callum did some amazing things at Aston Martin, but this was not his greatest achievement. That being said, the Le Mans GT cars weren’t bad looking and sounded incredible. It’s a shame they weren’t more successful. Here’s to hoping Jag gives the F type consideration for that role.

  • avatar
    akatsuki

    Maybe it is just me, but the new F-type is just a 350Z/S2000 mix. I don’t get what people think is sexy about it at all.

    The XK just never got the proportions right, partially because of the golf bag boot, but it just never quite came together either.

    I have nothing against the new look of Jaguar, but they just aren’t making it work on the coupe side.

    • 0 avatar
      Sam Hell Jr

      At the Detroit auto show, passersby — especially women — literally would stop in their tracks, gawk at the F types, and stumble over like zombies to a fresh corpse. Mind you, these were just two shiny expensive cars on a floor full of them. No pedestals, no lights, no promo girls sewn into their blouses. The appeal is almost primal. I didn’t see that kind of attention being drawn by anything else at the show without barkers and special effects.

      Ordinarily I allow for differences in opinion on asthetic matters. But sweet Jesus, man, the F Type is just stupid good looking.

  • avatar
    VenomV12

    When I looked at both this and the F-Type side by side, I honestly found this to be the better car. They are both great cars, I am not sure it was necessary to kill this car, maybe just update it a little.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States