By on August 2, 2013

GM Oshawa Plant Closure

Bloomberg and Sky News have reported that the Canadian government has started a selection process to find investment banks for selling off of the stake the government took in General Motors as part of its own contribution to bailing out the automaker. Late last year, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said that Canada had no intention of holding those shares long-term. Together the federal Canadian and provincial Ontario governments own 140 million shares of common GM stock, valued at $5.1 billion (US), a 10% stake in the automaker, which makes Canada the company’s third biggest shareholder behind the U.S. Treasury and the UAW’s VEBA health plan. The governments had originally invested $9.5 billion in GM back in 2009, selling off 35 million of its shares when GM made its initial public offering of stock in the reorganized company.

In response to the news reports, a spokeswoman for Flaherty said in an email, “The government of Canada remains committed to exiting from ownership of GM as quickly as feasible, while maximizing the value of the government’s interests for Canadian taxpayers.” GM shares are now trading at 11% above the post-bankruptcy IPO price, and are up 27% this year. Around the same time that the Canadian finance minister made his remarks last December, GM announced that the U.S. Treasury would be selling it’s entire stake in the car company within 15 months.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “Canada Preparing to Sell Its 10% Stake in GM, Reports Say...”

  • avatar

    So the Canadians are poised to actually get all their money back? And none of their auto-centric cities have gone bankrupt? What the hey!

  • avatar

    I’m of two minds about this. I like that we can get our money back but I also want leverage that an owner has with some of the moves that GMNA has been doing. I’m afraid that they’ll pull out of Canada completely. It’d be nice if we could stand up and give them a hearty FO! and make them stay.

  • avatar

    The Canadians were smart in holding on to their GM stake until the share price recovered.

    • 0 avatar

      BUt I think one of the reasons that GM stock finally began to climb out of the cellar is because the US gov’t started selling shares. Reasoning goes that had they continued to hold the shares, the share price may have continued to be in the cellar or risen at a much slower rate.

      Regardless, Treasury has always stated that the goal is not to make money on this deal. Their times to sell stock are supposed to be based on what’s good for the company, not just considering when the sale would be most profitable to the govt.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    Luke42 - I have kids. Sedans are suboptimal for kid-hauling, especially at a $35k price point – nevermind $70k-$135k.
  • Re: Did Volkswagen USA Sales Really Increase In September? Sort Of

    Lorenzo - Poor Jack Dawson developed a taste for luxury on the Titanic, slipped the Heart of the Ocean gem in his pocket during the...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    28-Cars-Later - “These first few hundred are the Signature series models” I had *better* be able to get a carriage roof on my Signature Series Model S.
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Thank you. I had the same complaints earlier ^^^. Facts don’t matter to the detractors, who also like to mix in their disdain for govt subsidies and...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    Luke42 - I’ve never had much trouble opening hatchbacks in the snow. The sliding doors on my minivan can be locked by ice, and sometimes I have to get in there and...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Well, that was predictable. Tesla is now the EV sales leader in the US, with gas at $2.23 in my area. The only other cool-looking EVs coming soon are from...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    Vulpine - Too many mistakes in that article, as well as some plain old misinformation. Nearly every negative point the author makes was refuted by Musk himself at the...
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: The Last Days Of Bronco

    Drzhivago138 - It says a lot about the number of people who actually utilized the 1st gen’s removable top that it was discontinued for the 2nd gen.
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: The Last Days Of Bronco

    Ronnie Schreiber - “so many people on this board giddily tell us how they have no need for the lower classes” Sorry, but I’ve been reading TTAC...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Gigafactory. If it doesn’t reduce battery costs sufficiently, Tesla either raises prices or they go out of business. If it does reduce battery prices...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Doug DeMuro, United States
  • Steven Lang, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, United States
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States