By on April 15, 2013

Red alert for armchair marketing strategists: Daimler plans what surely will be branded as an inexcusable watering down of its brand equity: The Mercedes brand is working on a series of very small (under 4 meters) and affordably priced (17,000 to 20,000 Euro) cars.

According to Germany’s Focus magazine, the baby Benzes will be Daimler’s answer to BMW’s Mini. According to the story, the series will launch with a small SUV below the GLA, and a small van in 2015. A year later, a 3 door version will follow. The cars will be based on Daimler’s A-Class, but will be much shorter.

Daimler urgently needs to make its cars attractive and approachable for younger demographics as the bulk of its core customers is about to retire – at least as far as its home market is concerned.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

12 Comments on “Smaller, Cheaper Benzes Ante Portas...”


  • avatar

    there might be hope for Mercedes yet.

  • avatar
    stars9texashockey

    Isn’t that what Smart is?

  • avatar
    Kevin

    If there’s one thing Daimler can do with the best of ‘em, it’s cheapen cars out. Look at the abominations they marketed under the Chrysler name.

    • 0 avatar
      Stumpaster

      Blah blah blah blah blah – Chrysler 300 was an awesome car under MB and it still is doing well.

      • 0 avatar
        Kevin

        I cannot imagine why someone would’ve paid $35,000 for a car with an interior by Fischer Price, at least when it came out.

        Now the interiors are quite nice, but then again they’ve washed their hands of that Mercedes leadership.

  • avatar
    CV Neuves

    I am not sure what Benz is about here. The Mini sells as an arguably well executed re-incarnation of a cult vehicle. An A-Class derivate would be just another small car, with a “luxury”-badge – the Cadillac-lbaled Daewoo comes to mind. It does not give a younger audience extra disposable income to spend on a label.

    Benzers should maybe try to tell their accountants to shut up and have their designers come up with a new S-Klasse based on technology, quality, durability and style to re-establish the marque. Its glory days are now a couple of decades in the past. With their plethora of styles out there – A-, B-,C-, E-, G-, M-, R-, S-Klasse, CLA, CLK, CLS, GLK, ML, SL, SLK, SLS, Citan … – Benz turns more and more of a brand for the masses, which may be ok for them financially. Just as a distinguished “luxury”-brand they are losing ground. I would not consider any of their models – even if I had the money.

  • avatar
    Stumpaster

    They need a separate brand – Simca, Yugo, ZAZ come to mind.

    • 0 avatar
      CV Neuves

      How about “Talbot” – with residual English class? If something German is required they may wish to revive “Goggomobil” for their minis. However, this is owned by BMW. “Goliath” – a small post-war car known as the “band aid bomber” produced by defunct Borgward – might be a marque easier to come by.

  • avatar
    niky

    The SMART was simply too expensively engineered.

    The smart way to make a small car is to go low-cost then ante up with options, as BMW did with the MINI.

    An A-Class derived super-mini is definitely necessary to compete with MINI and the A1. But they have to play it smart. Something like the CLA will still play to upscale pretensions while expanding their reach downmarket… a whole lot better than something like yet another A-Class or B-Class derivative would.

  • avatar
    Oelmotor

    It appears Renault/Nissan will play a more influential role with Daimler`s small car development plans.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: 2015 BMW X4 xDrive28i Review (With Video)

    VenomV12 - As someone who has a lot of family in Canada and we have talked about this before, I am baffled how these people afford these homes? I feel sorry for...
  • Re: 2016 Acura ILX Review: Big Changes Make The ILX Competitive, Not A Segment Leader

    spreadsheet monkey - Out of interest, what do you drive, DW? And what else besides the S2000 would make it into your list...
  • Re: Review: 2015 BMW M235xi

    hgrunt - 1998, when the e46 came out, it was called fat and soft vs the e36…in a recent review of the E46 M3, the reviewer called it “analog” but when it came...
  • Re: 2015 BMW X4 xDrive28i Review (With Video)

    VenomV12 - My friend’s dad had a Buick Park Avenue Ultra when we were in high school and goddamnit if that was not one of the best riding and most...
  • Re: Review: 2015 BMW M235xi

    hgrunt - I recently test drove a nearly no-option 2015 Ecoboost mustang and nearly fully loaded GT back to back. They felt remarkably similar to my E46 330i ZHP, which had Bilstein...
  • Re: 2015 BMW X4 xDrive28i Review (With Video)

    VenomV12 - BMW is a goddamn mess. To me the brand becomes less and less prestigious and appealing everyday and most of their models just seem like desperate,...
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    DeadWeight - I’m not a troll. I’m a relentless critic, cynic & skeptic of things automotive; the world needs far more people like myself, and if there were more,...
  • Re: Yahoo Autos, Autoblog Gain New Editors

    VenomV12 - I didn’t know there was a Yahoo Autos and Autoblog has been a giant mess for some time now.
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    VenomV12 - As I said before, I would actually like to see this happen.
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    VenomV12 - I like DW, I second that nomination. BTSR would also be good, that would make this one hell of a crazy and interesting site too. Ha Ha.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States