CAW May Try New Tactic Of Simultaneous Talks With Automakers

by Derek Kreindler

Published: August 30th, 2012

caw may try new tactic of simultaneous talks with automakers

The CAW may abandon their tactic of using negotiations with one automaker as a precedent for other negotiations, and conduct simultaneous talks with Ford, Chrysler and General Motors.

The CAW is holding separate talks with the Big Three automakers in Toronto, and the union is staying mum about a possible “target automaker”, in the apparent hopes that the simultaneous talks are successful. The CAW’s contract expires at 11:59 P.M. on September 17th, and CAW President Ken Lewenza told Reuters that any decision regarding a target company would come at least five days beforehand.

The new tactic isn’t entirely unheard of; the UAW used the simultaneous negotiations move in 2009, though they ultimately settled on GM as their target. Given the incredible tough climate for both the CAW and the automakers, this could be a way for both of them to reach a compromise while mutually saving face. All three automakers are looking to reduce labor costs, while the CAW, at least publicly, is dead set against concessions on the part of the workers.

Speaking to the Windsor Star, Lewenza said that

“If I have it my way, I won’t have to announce a target company…If one of the companies will signal that we can get a deal, if we can get the framework of a deal in the next 10 days and I share that framework with the other companies, there won’t be a need for a target company,” he said.

Given Lewenza’s recent tone (which may be understandably firmer in the run-up to negotiations) this seems fairly pragmatic. And how about this nugget, also reports by the Star

If the companies “agree that workers are entitled to share in their success in a modest way, we can get a deal,” said Lewenza.

What does that mean? An open door for profit sharing…?

#CAW #Chrysler #ContractNegotiation2012 #Ford #GeneralMotors #Labor #Labour #Negotiations #Union #Unions

Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 7 comments

Highdesertcat on Aug 30, 2012

If the workers want to share in their success, let them buy stock! Give them ESOPs or pay their bonuses with stock. Let's see how amenable they are to that.

Like Reply
Dimwit on Aug 30, 2012

The workers via the union already own a chunk of stock. Hell, they're on the board as well. Lewenza is trying to save face but the reality is that there is NO big 3 anymore. Each has become more different than alike. Even if one gave serious concessions the other two would go, "So?" You might as well deal with each simultaenously. Shortens the pain, anyway.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Highdesertcat on Aug 30, 2012
  
  Yup, and in the end they'll walk away with less than what they have now and learn to like it. Since GM and Chrysler went belly-up in 2009, then the subsequent bailouts and unceremonious dumping of Chrysler on Fiat with an overt bribe of $1.3B, things have changed in the collective bargaining game. They'd better tread lightly. We really need to see more outsourcing to Mexico. And we're seeing that already but maybe these simultaneous negotiations will speed things up. The manufacturers got to go where they can make money. They owe that to their shareholders!
  
  Like
- Mikey on Aug 30, 2012
  
  @Dimwit...got to correct you on one point. The UAW owns GM shares via thier VEBA fund. The CAW, made no such deal. The Canadain and Ontario government hold around 9 percent, I think.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Lorenzo I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.