By on July 22, 2012

Former Nissan racer Steve Millen’s aftermarket performance company Stillen is running a contest involving Facebook. Amateur designers can style the company’s body kit that will accompany Stillen’s performance toys for the Scion FR-S. The winner will get to attend SEMA this November, when the body kit will have its first public display. When I saw the headline my first thought was, “What, another social media hypefest?” Just the other day, Derek Kreindler questioned the value of Nissan’s efforts to crowdsource product planning via social media sites. Does the general public know any more about designing cars than it does about product planning? As thousands of aesthetically challenged body kits will attest to, the most talented designers seem to be working for OEMs and design houses, not the aftermarket. Then, my cynical self calmed down a bit and the automotive history buff in me took over and I realized that it’s just a new gloss on an old idea. Entrants have to design their own body kit that consists of a front lip spoiler, side rockers, and rear valances. Stillen’s professional in-house designers will judge the entries, winnowing them down to the top 5 designs. Then via Facebook the public will pick the winner. Stillen has provided a template at the contest’s webpage, and they are encouraging people to enter (multiple times, if they wish) even if they don’t have top level digital rendering skills, saying that the judges’ focus will be on shape and design, not how much Autodesk wu you have.

The use of Facebook may make this contest look contemporary but it hearkens back to a design competition for young designers that started in the 1930s and lasted over three decades, the Fisher Body Craftsman’s Guild. Not only was the Guild an important part of the way General Motors marketed itself to young people, but GM’s styling department, then under the leadership of Harley Earl, also used the Guild competition in a serious manner to identify and mentor teenagers with enough talent to actually design cars. Furthermore, at its heyday, the Fisher Body Craftsman’s Guild was a bit of a cultural force. With over 8 million participants, the only youth organization with a larger membership was the Boys Scouts of America. If you were a member of both organizations, you could use your Guild entry to win a merit badge.

Obviously, the Guild was bit more serious than Stillen’s contest, though the goal was about the same: identify talent. Instead of a trip to Vegas, Guild winners won college scholarships. There were junior and senior classes, with first and second place winners in both age categories, as well as regional winners in the national competition. Guild competition winners didn’t just get scholarships. At least two dozen winners went on to careers as auto designers including some very notable stylists like Virgil M. Exner, Jr., Chuck Jordan (who eventually ran GM styling), Richard Arbib, Elia ‘Russ’ Russinoff, and John M. Mellberg.

Though the rules changed over the years, the original structure of the competition was in two levels. The first was to scratch build a scale model of the Napoleonic coach that had served as Fisher Body’s logo since 1922. Winners of that competition would then design and submit models of their idea of a futuristic “dream” car. In 1937, perhaps as a reflection of how important Earl’s Art & Colour department had become in GM’s business model, along with the establishment of design studios at Ford and Detroit’s contract body builders like Murray and Budd, the rules changed to allow an entrant’s choice of either doing the coach or a car model.

The Fisher brothers, like many other successful Detroit automotive industrialists, were very charitable and the Guild started as an effort in philanthropy, with an emphasis on the scholarships. The scholarships were valuable. In 1934, the top prize was a $5,000 college scholarship. With inflation that works out to about $85,000 in 2012 dollars but college costs have vastly outpaced inflation so a $5,000 scholarship was pretty much a full ride deal. In 1934, for example, at the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school, tuition was $400 and total annual costs including fees and room & board were less than $1,000 year.

By the late 1950s, though, with past winners working at GM and other companies as designers, many young men understood that winning the competition was a career opportunity to do the thing they loved most, beyond just the chance for a college educations. I say young men because the program was clearly aimed at craftsmen and not craftswomen. Entry blanks in 1930s vintage ads for the Guild say “Boy’s name”, and even into the late 1960s, the ad copy mentioned boys even if the entry blanks didn’t. It’s not clear if girls’ entries would have been rejected but the Guild’s male focus has not escaped attention from academic feminists.

It’s interesting that just as the domestic auto industry embraced youth marketing in the late 1960s, they abandoned the Guild. Perhaps a model making contest was seen as a bit old fashioned after 1967′s Summer of Love. In any case, 1968 was the final year of the competition. Of late there’s been a flurry of interest in the Guild, with books like John Jacobius’ The Fisher Body Craftsman’s Guild: An Illustrated History and reunions. The vintage models have even attracted attention from the fine art world. Veterans of the Guild have called on GM to bring it back and, to be honest, with the rendering and 3d printing tools available today, the results might be very impressive. If I was Ed Welburn and Joel Ewanick, I’d pay close attention to Stillen’s contest.

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can dig deeper at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

13 Comments on “Stillen Will Sell Scion FR-S Body Kit Designed By Contest Winner – Should GM Bring Back the Fisher Body Craftsman’s Guild?...”


  • avatar
    el scotto

    GM should revive the guild. Think of the good publicity and having some good designers can’t hurt them. Then I could sit back and watch the GM haters/Obama bashers/guild? that’s socialism types work themselves into a collective frenzy. F1 and NASCAR are both on, time to go channel surf.

  • avatar
    Ryoku75

    I’ll just sit back and wait for FRS’s with either missing bumper covers or mis-colored ones, once the custom ones fall off.

  • avatar
    dejal1

    No. Because sometimes you DO end up with hacks like Chuck Jordan.

    The fins should have gotten him blackballed from working anywhere as a designer.

    • 0 avatar
      Gannet

      Um, no. Jordan was brilliant, one of the greats. You don’t like his stuff, that’s fine. The world disagrees with you.

      • 0 avatar
        Ryoku75

        His cars looked fine but were completely impractical.

      • 0 avatar
        dejal1

        The fins were ugly and gaudy. His tenure was during a time that the Japanese ate his lunch. The Japanese started off with
        styling that came out of a Godzilla movie, saw the error of their ways and moved on. GM, not so much.’

        GMs (and his) response?

        The Vega.

        The Monza. Especially the Monza Mirage, with the glued on fender blisters and giant decal.

        A giant chicken decal on the Firebird.

        Chevy Citation, especially with the great X10 styling performance package.

        Chevrolet Cavalier (not too bad).

        Cadillac Cimarron (a joke). Called that one in. Change the grill, taillights and badges and go to lunch.

        The 1976-1979 Cadillac Seville. Just a Chevy Nova.

        Late 80 Buicks where you couldn’t tell if it was full size or mid size until you saw the name plate.

  • avatar
    John

    Body kits have to be one of the dumbest automotive inventions of my lifetime, ranking up there with double neon windshield wipers.

  • avatar
    NormSV650

    Civic unpainted body kits still in primer gray…the trend continues. But the big fish mouth may have lended suggestion to Mazda smiley faces and Acura big beaks.

  • avatar
    mnm4ever

    The problem with body kits is that the type of person who is drawn to using them usually has very bad taste, and therefore most of them look terrible. Obviously there are exceptions, some of the Tech Art kits for Porsches look fairly tasteful, but for the cheap cars like Civics, they just look dumb. I predict that the ones designed by the Facebook crowd for the FR-S are going to be tacky.

  • avatar
    DaeGoesFast

    My two step program to win this contest:

    Step 1: Steal design from the original concept FT-86

    Step 2: Win Contest!

    Seriously though, the way the marketing campaigns work is ingenious for the whole industry. They reveal a radical concept car with a design they know they would never produce. The design likely ties with nostalgic emotions or is inversely radical enough to be unforgettable. This helps to market a name with an image. Then a year or so down the road they come out with the production version that is without a doubt a disappointment to our expectations, but not to worry! We can spend the rest of wallet on cosmetic enhancements that still don’t live up to our original expectations! And the vicious cycle of a market that succeeds by the disappointment and division of its consumers continues. Does anyone really know what they are buying in this grand scheme?

  • avatar
    dtremit

    Interesting that the top scholarship didn’t change from 1933 to 1966! Either way, a lot of money for its day.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India