Moose Test Redux: The Cherokee Blows Its Tires

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Are we all Moose Test experts by now? Presumably so. TTAC has covered Moosegate from the perspective of a skeptical American and an indignant German so far, and now there’s more (moose) fat to chew.

Yesterday, I sent this email to Rabe Mattias at Teknikens Varld:

Thank you for contacting us to provide the full details on your test.

Can you offer an opinion or theory as to why the Grand Cherokee


repeatedly displayed the wheels-up behavior during your testing but


did not display the same behavior during Chrysler’s observations?


Thank you!

We didn’t get a response. Here’s what we did get:

In a new video, the magazine claims that Jeep’s load standard for the Grand Cherokee isn’t reasonable — that “with a driver and four adult passengers, there is hardly any room for luggage.” North American SUV-market observers shouldn’t be surprised by this: one of the things that came out of the infamous Ford Explorer Firestone debacle was the fact that the Explorer didn’t actually have enough payload rating to carry five American adults at all. (The 1995 Explorer’s payload, 980 pounds, was better than that of the Infiniti QX4, which was an unintentionally hilarious 795 pounds!) American buyers don’t put five adults in an SUV. The common load is one 120-pound trophy wife, a hundred pounds of completely unnecessary toddler-related crap, and a small child who, in both dimensions and weight, is roughly equivalent to a Thanksgiving turkey. In a pinch, Dad may come along, assuming the weather prohibits an afternoon round of golf.

Once the Grand Cherokee was loaded to Chrysler’s suggested spec, which depending on whom you believe is either the correct spec or an unbelievably crooked attempt to game the test, the Grand Cherokee didn’t go for the two-wheel hokey-pokey. Instead, it repeatedly blew its left front tire — a total of seven times, according to Teknikens Varld. The video shows the left-front tire blowing again and again.

Strictly speaking, a blown front tire shouldn’t constitute a failure of the “moose test”. In practice, most SUV owners would be deeply annoyed if they had to replace the front tire every time they put the car through an avoidance maneuver.

Who’s to blame here? Is the test rigged? Is the Cherokee unsafe? Are the Euro-market tires to blame? Are they different from the tires specified on US-market Grand Cherokees? Having run the GC SRT-8 around “Big Willow” quickly enough to lap a bunch of Chally-SRT-driving journosaurs, I’m pretty convinced that the SRT version would absolutely breeze the moose test… but what about the base Laredo?

In a perfect world, TTAC would be able to purchase a GC off the showroom floor and go through the test ourselves. Since we don’t have an extra $40K sitting around, we can at least offer to do the driving and take the rollover risk if someone else wants to buy the vehicle. Any takers?

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 151 comments
  • 3-On-The-Tree My 2009 C6 corvette in black looks great when it’s all washed and waxed but after driving down my 1.3 mile long dirt road it’s a dust magnet. I like white because dust doesn’t how up easily. Both my current 2021 Tundra and previous 2014 Ford F-150 3.5L Ecobomb are white
  • Bd2 Would be sweet on a Telluride.
  • Luke42 When will they release a Gladiator 4xe?I don’t care what color it is, but I do care about being able to plug it in.
  • Bd2 As I have posited here numerous times; the Hyundai Pony Coupe of 1974 was the most influential sports and, later on, supercar template. This Toyota is a prime example of Hyundai's primal influence upon the design industry. Just look at the years, 1976 > 1974, so the numbers bear Hyundai out and this Toyota is the copy.
  • MaintenanceCosts Two of my four cars currently have tires that have remaining tread life but 2017 date codes. Time for a tire-stravaganza pretty soon.
Next