Junkyard Find: 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

We've had a run of European machinery in this series lately, with six of the last ten Junkyard Finds coming from across the Atlantic ( one from Sweden, one from Italy, two from West Germany and two from France), so today it's the turn of that most Michigandic of machinery: A Chrysler minivan.

Chrysler scored a huge sales hit with its K-platform-derived Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager front-wheel-drive small vans, which debuted as 1984 models and immediately joined forces with the new XJ Jeep Cherokee—also new for 1984—to begin the process of annihilating the station wagon once and for all.

That first generation of squared-off Chrysler minivans lasted through the 1990 model year (the Chrysler-badged Town & Country showed up that year), and it included hot-rod turbocharged vans as well as some with manual transmissions.

The second-generation Caravan/Voyager/Town & Country stayed on the same wheelbases but got got smoother lines and packed on an additional 500 pounds or so of added bulk. Today's Junkyard Find is one of those first-year second-generation Caravans, and it's loaded.

The interior in this van is so nice that I thought it might be a church-on-Sundays-only 50,000-mile vehicle, but in fact it had 165,920 miles on the clock at the end.

Just look at the well-preserved glory of those Nearly Velour™ seats!

This is a high-zoot LE Grand Caravan with front-wheel-drive, just one notch down from the LE AWD Grand Caravan on the Dodge minivan prestige ziggurat for '91.

List price started at $19,255, which comes to about $44,013 in 2023 dollars.

Lesser Caravans got a Chrysler 2.5-liter straight-four engine or Mitsubishi 3.0-liter V6 that year, but the LE received this Chrysler 3.3-liter V6 rated at 150 horsepower and 185 pound-feet.

A five-speed manual transmission was available on the Caravan and Voyager all the way through 1995 (the final year of the second generation), but only with the 2.5 four-cylinder engine. As a Grand Caravan LE, this one has the four-speed automatic rather than the three-speed automatic that went in the more proletariat-grade vans for '91.

Chrysler was going all-out with standard driver's-side airbags in its vehicles by this time, but a bag was still an option for the 1991 Caravan. This one doesn't have one.

This Infinity AM/FM/cassette radio was a $461 option if purchased separately ($1,054 today), but it appears that this van has the Luxury Value Discount Package that included the Infinity audio rig, at a price of just $232 ($530 after inflation) on the Grand Caravan LE.

Were these seats ever used?

All-wheel-drive was new for Chrysler minivans in 1991, and Voyager advertising pushed it relentlessly.

It's the Magic Wagon.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 41 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Nov 27, 2023

    These first crude minivans made a lot of sense, and were hugely successful. The station wagons they replaced were inefficiently designed, very long and wide but with a low roofline. This is an IDIOTIC Design for a car that needs to maximize its volume.


    Having said that, I remember a bunch of us visiting an oil company at Houston for a consortium meeting (we had research proposals for rather modest grants) around that year, 1990 or 1991, a some idiot decided to rent one of these so they would save a few bucks. On the trip back to the airport I sat in the god damned middle row, and it was sheer torture, very cramped, zero legroom.


    Minivans since then became far superior megavans, really. The Odyssey above all and the Sienna also are great family haulers, heavy, big, long wheelbase, and perfect for long trips of a large family. But morons buy Fake SUVs ("Crossovers") instead. Or, even worse, "Broncos".

    • The Oracle The Oracle on Nov 27, 2023

      My goodness you are showing your advanced age today, boomer.


  • Mr Imperial Mr Imperial on Dec 09, 2023

    Seeing the adjusted-for-inflation amount always makes me sick, I can't believe how much it has gone up in my 40-some-odd trips around the sun. Still fondly remember seeing these and Ford Explorers everywhere.





  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
Next