RIP Paul Fussell: A Tribute To The Man Who Informed My Perceptions On Luxury Automobiles

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

A credit to my parents (among many); they turned everything into a “teachable moment”. A new addition to my vocabulary came with a lesson on the root word, and whether it came from Latin, or French or Greek. A new song came with a quick history of Manchester 80’s New Wave, or Delta blues. My allowance was paid after chores and before a lesson on budgeting. A new car magazine had to be read and not just scanned through for pretty pictures.

And so came one of the lessons that ended up changing how I viewed the world. I was in my early teens, and had just discovered Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities, when my father suggested I read Paul Fussell’s Class. “It’s even got some car stuff in there; he talks about how people buy SUVs to look like they’re rich enough to have a country home. Just read it. You’ll like it.”

I devoured Class, as well as Bad, which I considered the advanced, up-to-date version, and never looked at the world in the same way. Not many books have done that. To explain both would take another essay entirely, but both books do a wonderful job of deconstructing consumerism, advertising, marketing and most importantly, how all three prey on people’s insecurities relating to social status. Read them and you will feel both immune to “aspirational brand” marketing and also wondering about the class signals given off by friends, peers, people you interact with – and yourself.

Paul Fussell died today at age 88, and while his body of work is incredibly important in an era where class and money no longer have anything to do with one another, and the push to define ourselves through consuming goods has never been stronger. I leave you with the passage below, from Class, where Fussell ruthlessly dissects the semiotics of the automobile (and also perhaps, shows some indirect Panther love – remember, this book was written in the early/mid-80s)

“If your money and freedom and carelessness of censure allow you to buy any kind of car, you provide yourself with the meanest and most common to indicate that you`re not taking seriously so easily purchasable and thus vulgar a class totem. You have a Chevy, Ford, Plymouth or Dodge, and in the least interesting style and color. It may be clean, although slightly dirty is best.

You may not have a Rolls, Cadillac or a Mercedes. . . . The worst kind of upper-middle-class types own a Mercedes, just as the best own elderly Oldsmobiles, Buicks and Chryslers, and perhaps Jeeps and Land Rovers, the latter conveying the preppy suggestion that one of your residences is in a place so unpublic that the roads to it are not even paved, indeed are hardly passable by your ordinary vulgar automobile.”

And of course, some wisdom from my own mother, upon seeing the first $399/month lease deal for a BMW 320i

“Anyone can have a BMW now…and [redacted, her billionaire godfather] drives an old, beat up Buick.”

Two teachable moments, expressed in slightly different ways, updated for our times. Go out and buy the books. For the cost of a couple spark plugs, your outlook on the world will never be the same.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 46 comments
  • Philosophil Philosophil on May 25, 2012

    I know I'm going to get crap for this (and I realize I'm stretching the classical sense of the term somewhat), but if we think of class as marking various kinds of value hierarchies among social groups, then I think the clearest example of a 'class' distinction in the U.S. (and I would include parts of Canada in this), is along racial lines. The historical differences in the way people are regarded, treated, and so on, and the advantages, disadvantages of belonging to one racial group vs. another (and I'm speaking of multiple groups here, not just two), is still very palpable. One could argue as well that there's one along gender lines, but that's another can of worms. Other kinds of classes exist as well, but as other posters have pointed out, many of these tend to be constantly shifting and hence less 'enduring' than the kinds of class distinctions one might find in Europe. That doesn't make them any less real, only less 'traditional' when compared to the European notion of 'class.' I'd say a good indicator of class distinctions is social mobility. Wherever social mobility is restricted or constrained in ways the make it difficult for a person from one group to enter into another, then you have something akin to a class distinction (as a general rule, now, not as a strict one).

    • See 1 previous
    • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on May 25, 2012

      @nikita So Jews made their own country clubs, and when Jews were kept out of particular industries or trades, they started new ones (cf. Hollywood, the scrap industry). The GI Bill after WWII opened up the academic world to Jews, Italians, Poles and others that had been kept out of the elite colleges by actual quotas or more "gentleman's agreement" situations. Colleges had to compete for students' tuition money paid for by the GI Bill. Also, I don't recall the his name, but the president of Harvard at the time decided that the school could either be a school for rich kids or a school for the intellectual elite and he chose the latter.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on May 25, 2012

    I haven't read the book, but I'd already gotten the lesson. I'd been told in the early '80s that the rich drove Chevys and the well to do drove ten year old Chryslers. My father (born in 1907) told me that in the late '40s, it was Chevys/Fords for the rich, ten year old Packards for the well-to-do. My dad remembers the early '30s before FDR when the rich didn't drive - they were chauffeured in Pierce-Arrows, and the well to do drove three year old Nashes. The pattern remains, only the models change.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next