NAIAS: Chevrolet Concept Coupes

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Our Chevrolet event coverage comes to us courtesy of Byron Hurd and Speed:Sport:Life. Take it away…

“Near as we can tell, the Chevy press conference wasn’t actually about a car. For that matter, it wasn’t really about cars at all. The intro video for… whatever it was they were trying to introduce, was simply and near-endless string of “man on the street” interviews featuring what we can only assume is Chevy’s new target market. They’re young, they’re poor and they want cars. Also, they don’t really like or care about cars. They just want one, you know? Cuz like, Facebook, twitterconnectivityInternetRacecar.

As for the concepts? Well, they showed us two designs, both four-seater, two-door coupes. The code130R is something concocted from an emasculated Camaro and a little bit of BMW’s 1-Series, though (in many ways like BMW) they forgot to spec the attractive parts. The other draws heavily on the high-haunched (and nearly dead) Mitsubishi Eclipse and a little bit of GM’s own Cadillac Converj concept. Both were meant to capture the imaginations of this newfound youth market, so naturally, they’re an ADD-addled mish-mash of “needs” and “wants” as specified by a sample of the 80-million strong market that, in the Chevy presenter’s own words, can’t truly be defined. Fortunately, they can still be compartmentalized by a demographic, and that demographic wants two doors, Brembo brakes with cross-drilled rotors, and an iPod dock.

The last institution to so disastrously probe the youth market ended up the target of a federal investigation. Fortunately for GM, nothing Chevy’s market research teams have done is considered illegal. Some of us, however, might think it should be. ”

Edit: Powertrain details have surfaced. The Tru 140S (white one) uses a Cruze-derived 1.4L Turbo making 150 horsepower and 148 lb-ft, returning the all important 40 mpg. A 6-speed manual or 6-speed auto are the transmission choices. The Code 130R (red one) uses the same engine and transmission but also employs eAssist and a front engine, rear-wheel drive setup, whereas the Tru is front-drive.






Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • DR1665 DR1665 on Jan 10, 2012

    One thing I've noticed here on TTAC: Any mention of Mitsubishi is typically met with at least half a dozen sarcastic comments questioning their relevance and life expectancy. Yet, here I sit, perhaps the lone Mitsubishi fan in this audience, laughing that General Motors is only now - 20+ years after Mitsubishi introduced the Eclipse - thinking about introducing an Eclipse of their own - and it even LOOKS like an Eclipse (albeit, one that's been through the requisite, post-bailout Opel design studio). I wonder if there will be a collective groan, 12 years from now, when the third generation 'Chevy Tru 140 LS Z24 Irmscher(/'Buick Andante GSCXL Special') is released with Pontiac-inspired cladding and a dowdy V6 and slushbox. Will people still be so sarcastic about Mitsubishi's nearly 100% electric offerings? Just stirring the pot. :)

  • Ptschett Ptschett on Jan 10, 2012

    I kind of dig the red one. Makes me think of the early-'80's Celica notchback coupe that an upperclassman had when I was in junior high.

  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
  • FreedMike I don't think they work very well, so yeah...I'm afraid of them. And as many have pointed out, human drivers tend to be so bad that they are also worthy of being feared; that's true, but if that's the case, why add one more layer of bad drivers into the mix?
  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
Next