Feds Predict The Future Of The Auto Industry, Foresee Chrysler Freefall, GM Stagnation

by Edward Niedermeyer

Updated: February 11th, 2021

Automaker2008 model year2025 model year% ChangeAston Martin1,3701,182-13%BMW353,120550,66556%Chrysler-Fiat1,659,950768,241-54%Daimler287,330441,78654%Ferrari1,4507,658428%Ford1,770,8932,224,58626%Greely/Volvo98,397143,69646%General Motors3,095,1883,197,9433%Honda1,511,7791,898,01826%Hyundai391,027845,386116%Kia281,452460,43664%Lotus25231625%Mazda302,546368,17222%Mitsubishi100,729109,6929%Nissan1,023,4151,441,22941%Porsche37,70651,91538%Spyker/Saab25,95626,6053%Subaru198,581331,69267%Suzuki114,658124,5289%Tata/Jaguar-Land Rover65,180122,22388%Tesla80031,9743897%Toyota2,211,5003,318,06950%Volkswagen318,482784,447146%TOTAL13,851,76117,250,45925%

Reasonable minds can disagree about the wisdom of the auto bailout, but according to analysis by the EPA and Department of Transportation (based on data from the Department of Energy and auto forecasters CSM), the Government’s rescue of GM and Chrysler may not have been the best idea (at least from a market perspective). According to data buried in the EPA/DOT proposed rule for 2017-2025 fuel economy standards [ PDF here], Fiat-Chrysler is predicted to be the sick man of the auto industry by 2025, losing over half of its 2008 sales volume, while GM is expected to improve by only 3%, the second-worst projected performance (after Aston-Martin). In terms of percentages, even lowly Suzuki and Mitsubishi are projected to grow faster than The Mighty General. Ouch.

On the other hand, the proposed rule notes that data will be finalized before the final rule comes out. Besides, the agencies appropriately admit (in as many words) that projecting auto sales so far into the future is one hell of a crapshoot. Still, with the obvious exception of “Saab-Spyker” and with some skepticism about the projection’s optimism about overall market growth aside, these are not the craziest guesses I could imagine. Who knows what the future holds, but it certainly is a bit troubling that the government’s own data suggests the two automakers it bailed out may well have some of the weaker performances of the next 14 years. At least the Treasury could have sold off their remaining GM stock before this report was released…

#Bailout #CAFE #Chrysler #DOE #DOT #EPA #GM #Government #Projections #Sales

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 52 comments

SCE to AUX on Dec 23, 2011

Such long-range predictions will match the quality of global warming predictions, or Popular Science future car stories from the 70s.

Like Reply
- Loser on Dec 23, 2011
  
  Or the global cooling predictions of the 70's.
  
  Like
Volt 230 on Dec 23, 2011

"Tesla almost 4,000% HA HA HA funny crap this is" , says Yoda

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.