By on August 4, 2011

 

Saab’s white collar employees were getting blue in their faces from waiting for last month’s paycheck. Saab had to sell off slices of the company to pay workers who sit at home twiddling their thumbs. According to the always well informed Saabsunited (when it comes to good news), salaries were transferred today at 5pm. On to the next payday.

Meanwhile, things don’t look so good in China. In June, Saab signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Chinese distributor Pangda Automobile and car manufacturer Zhejiang Youngman Lotus. This had been feted as the second coming of Christ over in Flagwavingland. Put your ear on the ground. Hear that sound? It’s the Chinese, dragging their feet.

As we all know, time is money and Saab has neither. Pangda’s and Youngman’s investment into Saab must be approved by the Chinese government. For that, they need an application to get a lengthy process going. One would think those applications had been filed months ago. If Chinacartimes is correctly informed, those applications still need to be written. Says CCT:

“They are likely to submit the feasibility plan for Saab case to NDRC within three weeks.”

Now this is China. “Likely to submit” means: “Maybe we will, maybe not.” And “within three weeks” means: “Don’t rush me.”

It also means: “Don’t come to us for more money, sorry, our hands are tied.”

According to the CCT report, “due to restrictive policies by the Chinese government, the two Chinese companies are not allowed to make more investments to save Saab at the moment.”

Ordering more cars also is out of the question. Says CCT:

“Pang Qingnian, Youngman’s chairman, said that they could not make further investment in Saab by buying vehicles, as Youngman has limited quotas for vehicle import, but he believes Saab could go through the difficulties through various financing means.”

Then, Pangda’s Chairman had encouraging words. Report CCT:

“Pangda’s chairman Pang Qinghua said that if the plan could obtain approval in two or three months, Saab’s financial problem won’t exist, but there will be crisis if the approval takes a longer period.”

You can bet that this approval will not happen tomorrow. The deal needs approval from at least three regulatory agencies in China, one of them the powerful National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). This agency, and many other parts of the government are on record that they want just a few big car companies in China, and not more than 100 as it stands now.

In the unlikely event that the deal should be looked upon favorably, any approval will take a long, long time. The joint venture between PSA Peugeot Citroen and China’s Chang’an took a whole year to get all necessary official blessings. The fact that Chang’an is a state-owned enterprise, one of China’s largest automakers, and owned by government-owned China Weaponry Equipment, did not speed up the paper-shuffle. Imagine how long it will take when a car dealer and a small Chinese busmaker want to get permission for a ménage-a-la-trois with a walking dead.

The scuttlebutt amongst expat car-execs and expat auto-writers over a beer in Beijing’s Sanlitun bars goes like this:

  • An ice age in hell is given better chances than an approval of the threesome.
  • Pangda is thought to have written off any money sent to Trollhättan as advertising. Imported Saabs are thought to be too expensive and too close to much cheaper Buicks made in China.
  • All bets in China are on Saab going under, which will save the all-important face . The government will have to deny nothing, Pangda and Youngman are spared the mission impossible.
  • A bankruptcy will probably rev up interest in China. We hear the Chinese delegation was impressed by what they had seen in Trollhättan, and may want to bring parts of the factory to China on the cheap.

[UPDATE: The Swedish site di.se reported that "a major US investor plans to become part owner of Saab. Within hours, Saab denied the news. The speculation is that GEM, which funded Saab's white collar salaries this month was pumping the stock (which it just bought yesterday) in order to dump it fast. -EN]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “Saab Submitted To Chinese Water Torture...”


  • avatar
    tkewley

    Well, as has been pointed out innumerable times on this and many other sites, Saab is clearly done, and watching it seemingly eternally circle the drain is tiresome. Still, assuming business law in Sweden works anything like in the US, the officers of the company have a duty to shareholders and employees to seek the best possible outcome for all involved parties. That means pursuing every loan/partnership/offer that comes along, no matter how tenuous or flaky it may be. Bottom line, this may drag on for some time…

  • avatar
    Its_Magic

    @Bertel Schmitt, don’t forget the mysterious American saviour that popped up today.

  • avatar
    Domestic Hearse

    Bertel,

    Prior to all this (around bail-out time), GM sold the tooling for the OLD Saabs to China. I forget all the details. Sorry. But, what about that angle to the story?

    How does the old tooling and rights to old Saab designs play out, since all that stuff is already in China’s hands?

    Do you suppose this all might be a ploy by China to get ALL the vital organs of Saab on the cheap?

    • 0 avatar
      aristurtle

      Anybody looking at Saab at this point is there to get a few key assets at a steep discount, it ain’t just the Chinese. No real investor actually thinks there’s a viable car company there.

      • 0 avatar
        Pig_Iron

        @aristurtle “Anybody looking at Saab at this point is there to get a few key assets at a steep discount, it ain’t just the Chinese”

        I think the Chinese are still interested… but only in the IP they can get on the cheap, and the name they use at a later date.

  • avatar
    Robert.Walter

    The saga of SAAB is pure mystery.

    And Bertel’s “Put your ear on the ground. Hear that sound? It’s the Chinese, dragging their feet”, is pure poetry.

  • avatar
    CurtInFalcon

    It doesn’t make sense that GEM initiated the rumors of an American investor. Yes, the stock did surge for one day but the period of performance of the stock is for 15 days. If the American investor doesn’t come through, the stock will fall again before the end of the period. Higher stock prices are better for Saab because they reap the rewards at the end of the period. GEM doesn’t want to pay the higher price.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India