Alberta is a province in Canada. A lot is agricultural, but what is much more important are the treasures beneath the soil. Alberta sits on more than 1.7¬†trillion barrels of bitumen, better known as oil sand. That‚Äôs about equal to the world’s total proven reserves of conventional petroleum. Canadians are troubled that EVs might ruin these riches.
Oil sand competes with electric vehicles in insidious ways: Electric vehicles are expensive. They only make sense when the oil price goes up. It costs money to extract the oil from the sands. The higher the price of oil, the more sense it makes to harvest the sands. At 2006 prices, 170¬†billion barrels were considered economically recoverable from the sticky sands. That put Canada’s oil reserves in second place behind Saudi Arabia. However, it represents only 10 percent of what‚Äôs there. The people of Alberta should be as interested in higher oil prices as the proponents of EVs, one would think: The higher the price, the more sand can be turned into oil. Instead, the people of Alberta are getting very nervous.
‚ÄúElectric cars could make driving cheaper and cleaner, but also could put some Albertans out of work,‚ÄĚ worries the St. Albert Gazette. ‚ÄúCars are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. Electric cars could take care of those emissions, but what would that do to the demand for Alberta oil?‚ÄĚ
The Albertans are one step ahead of us. Instead of getting anxious about vanishing oil reserves, they get apprehensive about a sinking demand by a wide adoption of EVs. Which would put Alberta out of business. They still remember the 80s when oil became cheap and most of their mines closed. They became rich again by the middle of the last decade. Now, Canada is the largest foreign source of oil for the United States, supplying nearly a million barrels a day from oil sand, says the Gazette. Checking data by the U.S. Department of Energy, the number makes sense. However, it also makes sense to say that Canada only supplied 22 percent of the imported oil in one of the last months of 2010.
Be it as it may, reading the papers about the success of EVs, Albertans are worried about a bust cycle. People did what people do when they don‚Äôt know what to do: They assembled a panel of experts. ¬†The panel will first meet next Tuesday in Edmonton.
Talk organizer and St. Albert resident Perry Kinkaide already sees a new boom ahead for Alberta: It could mean a new auto industry in Alberta, he suggests, as oil companies shift from using oil as fuel to oil as a starting product for lightweight electric car parts. ‚ÄúIn the old days you needed to be near steel. In the new days, you may need to be where the oil is.‚ÄĚ Comforting thoughts – for Albertans.
Axel Meisen, chair of foresight at Albert Innovates Technology Futures, toots in the same vuvuzela: ‚ÄúAlberta should think of other uses for petroleum than for fuel, such as carbon fiber. This light, strong material will be popular in electric cars, and could see use in bridges and other buildings.‚ÄĚ
Al Cormier, the talk‚Äôs facilitator and executive director of Electric Mobility Canada, a national industry group that promotes electric vehicles, also sees no reason for alarm. EVs surely are the wave of the future and will lower the demand for oil, but ‚Äúassembling an electric vehicle probably takes just as long as assembling a regular vehicle,‚ÄĚ Cormier says, and he does not expect any job losses there. If the cars are assembled in Alberta.
The proceedings of the panel‚Äôs meetings will be available at www.abctech.ca.
Now here comes an heretic thought: If EVs¬† indeed become wildly successful and kill the demand for oil so much that Alberta will have to close oil sand mines and take to assembling electric motors and plastic parts, does that mean that us Luddites can drive down to the gas station and say ‚ÄúFill ‚Äėer up‚ÄĚ for, say, $1.80 a gallon?