California: Police Chief Blasts Red Light Camera Program
Nearly three out of every four Anaheim, California residents voted Tuesday to ban the use of red light cameras in the city. Twenty-five miles away in Gardena, the police chief warned the city council in February that the devices lack public support. Gardena began using automated ticketing machines five years previously. As the contract came up for renewal, city councilmen asked during a Finance Committee meeting for the police chief to report on the public perception of the camera program. Chief Edward Medrano’s assessment was brutally honest and did not tend to support the notion that the program was put in place to reduce accidents.
“Our research in Gardena has revealed there is no significant traffic safety impact as a result of the use of red light cameras,” Chief Medrano wrote in response. “At almost every intersection where we have cameras, collisions have remained the same, decreased very slightly, or increased depending on the intersection you examine. When combining the statistics of all the intersections, the overall consensus is that there is not a noticeable safety enhancement to the public.”
In January the city issued 797 tickets worth about $350,000 or $4.3 million on an annual basis at all six monitored intersections. These proceeds are split between the city, Los Angeles County, the state and the Australian company that operates the program, Redflex Traffic Systems. In light of the disappointing safety statistics, the perception that this revenue is what motivates local politicians to keep the cameras has grown.
“In general, the consensus among our community regarding red light cameras is not favorable,” Medrano wrote. “During many of the presentations about our public safety camera system, I answered many questions about the red light camera system, almost all of which were negative towards expanding the system.”
Despite the chief’s report, Gardena officials went ahead and renewed its photo ticketing contract with Redflex, signing a deal that will not expire until 2015, with options to extend until 2019. The city did act to remove a cost neutrality clause from the contract described as “ problematic in several other cities” — referring to the court cases which have declared such provisions illegal.
View a copy of the memo in a 170k PDF at the source link below.
Redflex Public Opinion (City of Gardena, California, 2/3/2010)
[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Canam23 I've rented them and found them...fine. I wish Ford had continued with or came up with a new generation Fusion which was a far better sedan.
- MaintenanceCosts The ES will do well in an electric version, assuming it's more thoroughly baked than the half-finished RZ. There's plenty of the Lexus customer base who use planes whenever they travel and don't need to drive their own cars outside the metro area.
- Legacygt It was more than 20 years ago that the Bangle designed BMW sedans started looking a little bit awkward. But the lineup today is chock full of downright ugly vehicles. This is one of them.
- Jeff It does state in this article that Europeans as well as Americans have cooled on EVs. I can see push back from consumers on the 2035 deadline for EVs in Europe and in states like California. I have no problem with manufacturers offering EVs but many for at least now don't want EVs. Maybe GM instead of planning to do away with the Malibu to make more EVs, GM should have offered the Malibu as a hybrid only like Toyota is offering the Camry for 2025. It would cost GM a lot less to offer a hybrid Malibu and it would outsell any EV that plant would produce. I even think GM would increase sales of the Malibu as a hybrid only and more competitive pricing.
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I fell asleep looking at that image.
Comments
Join the conversation
This issue is a prime target for a statewide California ballot measure (I'm not a big fan of props myself, but if the tool exists, why not use it?).
Traffic cams can be a positive thing, as it stands though they is nothing but a money grab.