Marchionne Wants The Unions To Show Some Respect

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Sergio Marchionne’s turnaround of Fiat was a weird one. He turned around a company, which most people thought had died already. Sergio’s turnaround was helped by GM’s unwitting “ re-capitalization” of Fiat, too. Recently, worker relations in Italy have been strained, to say the least. If you thought the situation with the UAW in the United States was bad enough, in Italy, things are spicier than Mamma’s Arrabbiata sauce. The Financial Times UK reports that Sergio Marchionne has finally lost patience with unionized Italian workers and has threatened them to change their mindsets or else be out of a job. The end of September is their deadline. Mr Marchionne wants Italy to help drag Fiat (and Chrysler) into one of the top five car companies in the world. But to do that, he needs concessions from his Italian workers. Big ones.

One of his main bugbears is the Pomigliano plant near Naples. He’s going to invest €700m into re-tooling it for the new Fiat Panda. In return for his largesse, he wants the unions there to achieve productivity on par with Fiat’s Polish plant (the Pomigliano plant only runs at 25 percent capacity at the moment), which will mean jobs cuts. The unions put it to a vote and came out 62 percent in favor of changing their ways. Great, eh? No. Fiat claims that 62 percent isn’t enough for the union to guarantee the changes that Fiat want in a sustainable fashion. If Fiat can’t get resolution on this deal, then this will severely hamper Marchionne’s 5 year plan, and as far as Marchionne is concerned, that isn’t happening! What makes this story interesting (as the Financial Times points out) is that this isn’t a game of poker where there are bluffs and counter bluffs. Fiat has stated quite clearly that if the unions don’t change their ways, production will move. There’s very little ambiguity. Now, if the unions don’t change their ways and Fiat does move production to a plant that will play ball, who will the Italian unions blame? Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear. Tony Soprano never had this trouble.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Djn Djn on Jul 01, 2010

    That plant, near Naples was built by then government owned Alfa Romeo to build the Alfa Sud in the 1970's. The location was chosen by the government to create employment in the south. Its been a disaster every since with poor quality and labor problems. They should probably shut it down. Government running companies.....

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Jul 01, 2010

    There's four different unions in the plant and three of them can see the benefit of Marchionne's plans, even if they don't smile at the same time. The difficulty is really with the far left FIOM union. Fiat don't want to leave the Panda in Tychy because they'd love to expand their production of the 500, which shares a line with the Ford Ka. That's running over 100% capacity. Interestingly, Fiat haven't yet suggested what an alternative would be to not taking the Panda to Pomigliano. I think there will be more hard ball, union-baiting comments to come, before any decisions are made. It's going to be a long, hot summer in Napoli.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next