Opel Aid Headed For Failure Again?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Technical experts analyzing GM’s request for $1.35b in Opel aid from the German government have reported back, and the signs aren’t looking good. According to the Financial Times, the experts advising a political committee that will rule on Opel aid next week returned a negative outlook on The General’s request. German officials tell the newspaper that

the technical experts’ stance was “formally not a complete No” but that it “meant No in practice”

GM is requesting €1.9b in loans for its €3.7b restructuring of Opel. Though it looks like the €1.2b ($1.35b) it is requesting from Germany will be turned down, some portion of that amount might still be awarded by local German state governments. If that scenario plays out though, more employment cuts could be in order for Opel’s German production staff.

GM’s timing for requesting government aid couldn’t be much worse. Germany is facing a huge outlay as part of its rescue plan for Greece and other fiscally struggling states in the Euro-zone. And this financial pressure is occurring on top of reluctance on the part of the German government to bail out the European operations of a now-profitable (except in Europe) GM. Germany’s finance minister Rainer Brüderle tells the WSJ [sub]

It’s an open secret that I’ve been skeptical of this whole thing from the beginning

Michael Fuchs, deputy member of the German parliament’s economics committee adds his skepticism to the record [via Automotive News [sub]], saying

We cannot possibly tell the people, “You have to put up with higher costs while we’re propping up a company like GM that is perfectly able to cope by itself.” I don’t expect the government to grant aid.

The Financial Times of Germany also reports [via AN [sub]] that

the advisory panel found no financial reasons to extend loan guarantees to Opel. That means any decision in favor of aid would be based on political rather than financial factors, such as a desire to preserve good U.S.-German relations

Given the current state of US-German relations, especially on the topic of Opel, this doesn’t make a deal seem any more likely.

The UK has already agreed to a nearly €300m loan package, and despite a change in governments in that country, the new Prime Minister has indicated that he will stand by the offer. If Germany’s federal aid falls through though, Opel union leaders say their deal with GM’s German division remain in effect, setting GM up for yet another confrontation with labor. After all, without the ability to cut jobs in retaliation for a German loan denial, GM will have little choice but to renegotiate with German unions, or make cuts elsewhere. With a Belgian plant already doomed to wind-down, and smaller loans from Spain and the UK hanging in the balance, losing German aid will force GM to jeopardize good relations with one of these more generous governments.

Opel’s Nick Reilly says that even if German federal aid falls through, up to four German states are likely to make up for at least some of the shortfall. He would not, however speculate on possible modifications to Opel’s restructuring plan, saying he is

not working on a Plan B

Maybe it’s getting to be time to start?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Tparkit Tparkit on Jun 01, 2010

    ..."any decision in favor of aid (for Opel) would be based on political rather than financial factors..." The only true words in the Financial Times piece. Everything else we read in the press these days, like the UK government's "offer" of a loan package, is political posturing aimed at striking a proactive stance while actually doing nothing, in the expectation that Washington will be forced to continue saving Opel in order to keep the lip gloss from washing off its Government Motors/UAW bailout pig.

  • Getacargetacheck Getacargetacheck on Jun 01, 2010

    GM really wants to go head-to-head with BMW? Fine, go beat them on their own turf. The auto business is truly global right? Move Cadillac to Germany and establish it there as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Have "Cadillac" buy one or two high-wage Opel plants and put some Germans (maybe Karl Stracke?) in charge (particularly those with a chip against Daimler and BMW). Then, build the rest of the Opels in Eastern Europe and blame the Western Europe plant shutdowns on the German government. Better yet, scrap the Opel (and Vauxhall and Holden and Daewoo) name altogether and make them Chevrolets worldwide. Opel problem solved.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next