Saab's Crown Jewels To Be Carted Off To China

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Bloomberg read it in Sweden’s Dagens Industri that General Motors will send the tools for Saab’s new 9-5 model to China. Mind you, these are not the old 9-5 tools sold to BAIC. These are the tools for the new Epsilon 2 based 9-5, or what Dagens Industri calls “the crown jewels of Saab.”



Stating the obvious, Dagens Industri states: “Without the 9-5, Saab’s attractiveness for new bidders fades quickly.”

According to Dagens Industri, some of the tools for the new 9-5 are in Opel’s plant in Rüsselsheim, Germany. From here, they will be shipped to the GM/SAIC joint venture in Shanghai, where they could be used to make the Buick La-Crosse, which has the same long-wheel based Epsilon 2 platform as the Saab 9-5. “First delivery from Rüsselheim will leave on Friday, January 15,” says a source for Dagens Industri.

More 9-5 tools have already been moved from Rüsselsheim to Trollhättan, in preparation for the spring series production of the 9-5. A Dagens Industri source said. “The next likely step is to dismantle the tools in Trollhättan and also move them to China.”

There is a similar story in Autocar that says that “GM has secretly booked transportation to shift the remaining 9-5 production equipment and tooling from Opel’s Russelsheim factory to GM’s Buick factory in China.” Autocar’s sources supposedly are “at GM Europe in Germany.” But it sounds as if they are at Dagens Industri. Even the ship date is the same: “The shipping will begin next Friday, 15 January, according to Autocar’s sources.”

Of course, the trucking-off of the Swedish crown jewels to China came as a big shock to the guys over at Saabsunited. They are still busy organizing Saab support convoys for January 17th. If the story above is true, the convoys will support a stripped shop. Saabsunited intimates that the story has been leaked by GM operatives, in order to hasten the final expiration of Saab. Saabsunited’s sources in Rüsselsheim say that “if GM decides to close Saab rather than sell it, then that tooling will be shipped immediately to China.”

All hopes of the Saab Defense League now cling to that little “if” and that “bookings can be canceled.” Folks, the teardown of a production line, even if it’s just for a “Null-Serie” (or preproduction series) takes a while and wants to be well planned. If the containers will leave in 5 days, then they are already packed by now, and tickets for the reassembly crew have been booked also. If the tools are crated up for overseas shipping, then someone has decided quite some while ago: “God natt, Saab!”

And what would Saab be worth without the new 9-5?

Stryker’s CEO Victor Muller wrote in an email to Saabsunited. “The NG 9-5 is of course in the business plan, and without it, the plan would not work.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 28 comments
  • Snabster Snabster on Jan 10, 2010

    At the right price, an Eplison-2 car could probably compete with a 5 series or E class. It might not be as good a car, but shaving 20K off the price would bring out buyers. And BAIC did not get the Eplison-2. If this story is true, it is being put into Shangahi-GM. BAIC got the older 9-5, which, as I've said before, will be a very hard sell to Chinese consumers.

    • See 2 previous
    • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Jan 11, 2010

      I'm w/Bertel here. I dimly recall the lack of alignment between GMHQ and GME regarding the Opel sale (or was it the SAAB saga?) was demonstrated elsewhere here on TTAC when the quotes between the HQ types and the GME spokesperson failed to align. (It was either this, or this was a blundered attempt to retrench ... before the internet made the world one, both things, i.e. misalignment and retrenching, happened easily and were more difficult to scrutinize. Now as to the possible reason for PR misalignment: It is a fundamental behaviour in the M&A world to try and manage information flow by limiting it to a small group of people directly involved in the process ("need to know.") It is likewise a basic behavior for those parties directly involved ("in the know,") to deny the existance of any action or deal; indeed, behaviours (always), incentives (sometimes) and punishments (often) are codified in an NDA which the individual must sign before receiving close-held confidential information. PR VP's are in the need to know circle, PR spokespersons are not. A spokesperson who is behind the curve, due to not being a need-to-knower, who doesn't have the skill to "talk but say a whole lot of nothin'" or quickly adopt a stance of "I'm unaware of that", risks not communicating the correct story, putting statements out there that allow insight into or misunderstanding of the story, or becoming the story himself, and ultimately getting canned for just complicating things. When deals are being done, "Loose Lips Sink Ships!", and those in the know keep silent, and if approached they lie, by denying the very existance of the deal until the ink is dry on the contract!

  • Tedj101 Tedj101 on Jan 11, 2010

    Robert, This is exactly the sort of information that makes TTAC valuable (and worth reading). I can read "press release drivel" anywhere! TED

  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
Next