Saab-Spyker Deal Sabotaged By Mobbed-Up Russian Finance?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM’s CEO and Chairman Ed Whitacre confirmed today that Dutch boutique sportscar firm Spyker is the only bidder for what’s left of Saab after the BAIC deal. Saab insiders insist that the firm can continue without the old tooling and technology sold to BAIC, and they still have their hopes pinned on the new 9-5 model. But, as the WSJ reports, Spyker earned a mere €7.9m in 2008 revenue, and has already endured an €8.7m net loss in the first half of this year. Spyker’s in no position to be saving struggling Swedish automakers. But behind Spyker is Convers Group, a Russian banking group with deep pockets… and a uniquely Russian reputation.

The NY Times reports that Spyker is

controlled by Alexander Antonov, a Russian tycoon who was shot seven times and reportedly lost a finger in a failed assassination attempt in Moscow in March. His son Vladimir Antonov, a 34-year-old banker who is a top executive at Convers, is chairman of Spyker.

At the time, news reports suggested the attack was related to Antonov’s “professional activities.” Fueling the mystery behind the hit, unnamed suspects who were arrested not long after the attack were then also tied to the assassination of Ruslan Yamadayev, an enemy of the Russian-backed president of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Though, as analyst Andrei Soldatov tells The St Petersburg Times, any links between Antonov’s assassination and Yamayedev’s could be fabricated to “make the impression that there is a different group, one that is not associated with the Kadyrov clan, that sought to kill the Yamadayevs.” Chechen blood feuds can be so damned complicated.

One thing is clear: Antonov didn’t get riddled with 18 bullets as a sign of admiration for his deep commitment to intellectual property law. And GM has indicated that IP concerns were a major reason for the death of the Opel deal to Magna, which had backing from another Russian bank. Saab sold its old IP and tooling to BAIC in order to keep the company as intact as possible in hopes of a last ditch deal with Spyker. To make even a minuscule amount of sense, that deal would have to include the new 9-5, which represents the only real value in Saab (nobody needs a Swedish factory). Saab says it can last for 3 months on the BAIC cash, but Ed Whitacre has made it clear that if a deal isn’t done by the end of this month, Saab will be liquidated. Given the wild reputation of the financier behind the purchase, that scenario looks more likely than ever.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Autonut Autonut on Dec 15, 2009

    Antonov is an amazing man! 18 bullets and only lost a finger. Anyway to tie Fritz Henderson to assassination attempt?

  • No_slushbox No_slushbox on Dec 16, 2009

    Oh my god, if Saab gets liquidated where will people get mediocre FWD cars? Those are so rare. The 9-5 is completely pointless since the Buick version of the Epsilon-II platform will also come with a manual transmission. If this Russian buys Saab he'll lose more than his finger.

    • PartsUnknown PartsUnknown on Dec 16, 2009

      Hilarious! You just can't help yourself, can you? Typical Camry driver...

  • Offbeat Oddity The price is definitely too high, but this generation of Accord has still been very reliable- not far off from the Camry. I believe the CVTs in these have held up very well, so while not ideal, it wouldn't deter me- the mileage is just way too high.
  • VoGhost "compliance EVs" - so typically Posky. Come on, Matt, come clean about what Big Oil is paying you already.
  • VoGhost Great to see leadership from Washington in supporting American businesses and job creation.
  • VoGhost Oh, Mattie, I am BEGGING you to take a course in economics. There's probably a community college near you offering courses for free or very cheap. Seriously, people this ignorant of basic economics really should not be writing this drivel. Stick to what you know: pimping for big oil.
  • 2manyvettes I was a computer instructor in a local technical college for some years teaching Windows OS and Micosoft Office. Not long before I retired I purchased a Mac Book Air laptop. It didn't take me long to learn the Apple OS and the first thing I learned was the lousy job Microsoft did ripping off the Apple software. I purchased Microsoft Office for Apple at the time and discovered when Apple upgraded the OS to 64 bit and my 32 bit Office software would no longer run on the laptop, that embedded in the Apple OS was software that could open any Office file and could save any file in Microsoft file format. I have always felt if Apple sold product at PC prices they would put Microsoft out of business. Oh, and I bought my Mac ten years ago and still runs like brand new. Effect on Rivian? Who knows? Based on my experience with their technology, it could be interesting.
Next